Alexis von Hoensbroech says the global push to decarbonize the aviation sector by 2050 will lead to a major increase in ticket prices unless governments step in to offer support.

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    High speed rail in the Montreal to Toronto corridor is a no brainer. Using conventional HSR technology (not 600kmh maglev shit) the time to get from Toronto to Montreal could be brought down to 2 hrs. Anything close to that would eliminate the flights on that route completely, with a much smaller carbon footprint.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fun fact: the most active air-route in North America is Toronto to NYC, which is about a 750km drive if you try to do a direct route, 850km if you follow the current Amtrak route through Albany, which hits all the major upstate cities for you.

      Dedicated high speed rail goes about 300-350km/h. It would be reasonable to image that trip taking 2.5 hours, maybe 3.5 or 4 hours if you do the Albany route and milk-run all the stops like Hamilton, Niagara, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, and Albany.

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The current rolling stock can hit 200kph; so proper tracks alone can bring that voyage to 2h45.

      A flight is 1h20 each way (average) but requires you to be at the terminal 1h in advance. We’re taking a 20 difference between flying and the train. Of you need to be downtown, that time is easily saved by Kot needing the UP express or (soon) the REM.

      Unfortunately operating speeds are not start to stop. That would probably still be around 3h15. The TGV can do ~270, getting us to the two hours.

      HSR plus a France style short-haul flight ban would flights everything inside Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal and drastically reduce Quebec and the horseshoe.