• Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      GOTO is the only thing that makes sense. It’s the “high-level” concepts like for-loops, functions and list comprehension that ruined programming.

      series.append(series[k-1]+series[k-2]) for k in range(2,5)]

      RAVINGS DREAMT UP BY THE UTTERLY DERANGED

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        if goto make sense why don’t you go to get some bitches

        • newIdentity
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because “get some bitches” is an invalid instruction

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I started coding with TurboBasic, which included the helpful innovation of GOTO {label} instead of GOTO {line number}, which allowed you to have marginally-better-looking code like:

        GOTO bob

        bob:
        {do some useless shit}
        return

        which meant you essentially had actual, normal methods and you didn’t have to put line numbers in front of everything. The problem was that labels (like variables) could be as long as you wanted them to be, but the compiler only looked at the first two letters. Great fun debugging that sort of nonsense.