Exploding-heads.com is another instance on Lemmy where alt-right MAGA types tend to reside. Some people on this server want us to defederate from them immediately, some people want to save defederation as a last resort. They have 104 active users (more stats below).

It seems that exploding-heads has also experienced a recent botswarm invasion. This is obviously another point in favor of defederating them, assuming you are worried about botswarms, which is currently being discussed here.

My advice to you all is please try to discuss this in a civil manner, we need not allow them to create divisive conflict inside our communities. No matter how the vote turns out, you’re not going to be able to defederate from your fellow sh.itheads so be nice.

I’ve linked many of the previous discussions below so people who are out of the loop can get a general sense of the situation.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 https://sh.itjust.works/post/225714 https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126 https://sh.itjust.works/post/410325

Lemmy.world just recently defederated them.

https://lemmy.world/post/747912

https://lemmy.world/post/577526

Although this could be considered a point in favor of defederation, it actually means even if we vote to remain federated, people have a great alternative in lemmy.world where they can still participate in our communities and simultaneously be protected from exploding-heads.

Ensuring diversity of servers is beneficial to the platform as a whole, but it is also not our responsibility to bear that burden.

TLDR, just wrap up any last points in this thread before we open the vote tomorrow. Please be civil.

EDIT: To clarify, this isn’t the official vote, this is the final discussion. The vote thread will be posted tomorrow and you will only be allowed to make a single comment saying Aye or Nay.

EDIT2: Vote thread is up, this thread is now locked. Very lively discussion thread sh.itheads. Please try to be more respectful next time.

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    for the purpose of political extremism/radicalization

    How do you define that?

    Many people consider their opponents to be political extremists. Many on the right wing would argue that BLM protesters were political extremists. They had confrontations with police, there was some destruction of property at BLM protests. Or, what about the protests / riots in France over pensions? Or the convoy protests in Ottawa, Canada?

    In my mind there’s a definite difference between BLM protests and say the Jan 6 insurrection, but it would be really hard to find an objective definition that included the “good” radical protests and excluded the “bad” ones.

    • tobor
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you define that?

      They literally included it in the second part of the sentence you left out

      to include rampant bigotry, racism, sexism, calls to violence.

      Or, what about the protests / riots in France over pensions? Or the convoy protests in Ottawa, Canada?

      You’re literally “whatabouting” this, no need put strawmen in here

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t seem to know what “whatabouting” means.

        Yes, I’m asking whether riots in France or BLM protests count as political extremism. Does rampant bigotry against pro-life protesters count?

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      “good is a point of view” --Darth Sidious.

      For the purposes of this discussion I’m deliberately not picking sides; “Let’s go kill some of our political opponents” has no place on this platform.

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bar was set at “rampant bigotry”, not “let’s go kill some of our political opponents”.

        Does rampant bigotry against billionaires count?

        • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can’t advocate for killing billionaires on this platform I’m really not interested in it. How are we supposed to solve any of our problems without violent uprising? That advocates that we keep living in this shitty status quo forever.

          • carbon_based
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Angy upvote. But the violent uprisings were rarely successful, mostly because the new leaders would just be violent again. Realising better ideas is successful.