• gravitas_deficiency
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mmmmmm how about the nations and companies who profited the most off of it?

    Yes, we are looking at you, BP.

  • sfgifz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the other hand, if countries like UK didn’t have the consumption demand to buy these resources there’d be less environmental damage because of less extraction.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, no it’s their fault for making it. Just like Africa should of never of had all those juicy natural resources and available slaves. It was their fault.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of the slaves were captured by Africans in wars fought for slaves. European slave raids happend, but mostly Europeans just bought the slaves from African leaders. That is one of the reasons Africa is so fragmanted today. As more local power mean more potential targets to raid and the smaller you are the less you have to share the wealth from the slave trade.

        • Benj1B
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I strongly, strongly suggest you revisit some of the preconceptions that led you here. I was going to instinctually retort, but instead took 5 minutes to read the relevant Wikipedia article on the topic: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa#West_Africa. It is clear that the topic is more nuanced than I originally thought, so thank you for bringing that to my attention, but it’s a crude and broad brush to imply that most slaves already existed in slavery prior to the Atlantic trade. There is also a significant difference between slaves in Africa who were exchanged between local groups in a wholly African context, versus slaves chained up and flung across the Atlantic with a 12% mortality rate and forced under a European slavery conception.

          I suspect your response has rubbed others the wrong way, as it did myself, so consider this an attempt to find a common ground for dialogue - whatever the history of Africs prior to the Atlantic Slave Trade, I think we can agree that what happened was utterly grotesque and an atrocity upon the history of our common humanity.

  • solariplex@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m norwegian and I support this message. We grew our riches by extracting luxurious poison from the earth, intoxicating the world. It’s time for rehab

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have a feeling nations like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and America won’t warmly embrace a British exPM’s idea for a tax on one of their greatest resources to subsidize foreign nations. Especially when it’s framed as their reparations for harming the world.

    • FarraigePlaisteach@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The. British are also silent when it comes to paying reparations for their own misdeeds overseas, which unfortunately strips this statement of credibility.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I found this quote from him pretty rich because of that:

        “These producer states have done literally nothing to earn this unprecedented windfall. It represents one of the biggest ever transfers of wealth from poor to rich nations.”

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We complain about the countries that extract the oil and the countries that burn it to make products, but ignore the fact that they do it for us…

    You won’t ever see politicians telling individual people to stop buying so much crap though, because that’s their right and it would hurt the economy…

  • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lets look at the Big Oil companies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermajor:

    • ExxonMobil formerly Standard Oil Company of New Jersey
    • Shell plc formerly Royal Dutch Shell plc
    • TotalEnergies formerly Compagnie française des pétroles
    • British Petroleum
    • Chevron formerly Standard Oil Company of California
    • Marathon Petroleum formerly The Ohio Oil Company
    • Phillips 66 founded in Oklahoma now HQs in Houston Texas
    • Valero , named after Mission San Antonio de Valero aka Alamo Texas
    • Eni - Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi founded and owned by a third by the Italian state
    • ConocoPhillips founded in Utah, HQs now in Houston Texas

    Which of these companies is Arabian, Persian, African or South American?

    All i can see is US Americans and Europeans, predominantly Englishmen and their descendents.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re just listing western firms which aren’t controlled by governments/royalty

      • Aramco
      • ADNOC
      • Kuwait National Peroleum Company

      Are all big and what he’s talking about

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if BP drills oil in Saudi Arabia and then sells it in, say, Egypt, do you think the UK makes money from that because the company has “British” in its name?

      • Since many stockholders are british, and the company has its headquarters in London, yes of course.

        But my argument is also historical, where many of the oil fields in Saudi Arabia used to be operated by western oil companies. The Wahhabi fundamentalists were brought into power by the British and Americans to make the access to oil easier for them, Iran was couped by the CIA for western Oil access etc.

        Blaming the countries where oil is exploited for the fossil society that was built and is maintained by western countries is cynical and hypocritical.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But my argument is also historical, where many of the oil fields in Saudi Arabia used to be operated by western oil companies. The Wahhabi fundamentalists were brought into power by the British and Americans to make the access to oil easier for them, Iran was couped by the CIA for western Oil access etc.

          Blaming the countries where oil is exploited for the fossil society that was built and is maintained by western countries is cynical and hypocritical.

          And thats exactly the excuse these people will use to pass the blame, when today, right now, its those countries that are in control of it and have profited BY FAR the most from it. So I really dont think its cynical to say that the people that profit from the fossil fuel industry should pay for climate change. Really thats the message climate activists have been saying for many years. Its just Gordon Brown is pointing out who those people are.