In familiar predicament for famously challenging client, multiple Florida lawyers decline to take Trump’s case, people familiar with the matter say.

  • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    The other option is the disintegration of rule of law into rule by law, where rule is used by the powerful as a weapon to attack ordinary people, but they themselves are above the law.

    The Roman Republic had a term for someone who is placed above the law to achieve a specific purpose with high priority (like holding an election): dictator. The office of dictator was rarely given out, and only for a limited period of time and for a specific purpose, because people were scared of abuse of the power of being above the law. When Julius Caesar consolidated enough political power to get whatever office he wanted, he chose dictator - and he literally brought down the republic, and tarnished the term ‘dictator’ to the extent that those that followed him chose to use the office of Imperator (later Emperor) to describe what they do instead of dictator.

    So should a political candidate who lost an election but is running again be given the same powers as a dictator in the Roman Republic? And be allowed to act with absolute impunity? I’d argue no, if they break the law they should be held to the same standards as everyone else. Obviously, he should be given a fair trial, and all the usual protections to ensure that he is only convicted of things he actually did though.

    • hadesflames@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imperator (later Emperor)

      Umm, just fyi… Imperator is Latin (you know, the language the Romans spoke) for emperor… And emperor is English for imperator…

      • BloodyFable@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the intent of the comment was to note how the word changed over time, not that Romans went from calling them Imperators to Emperors.

        • hadesflames@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He literally said “later Emperor” implying that Emperor and Imperator are different as opposed to literal translations.