Ban private jets and luxury emissions!
act.wemove.eu
The super rich are wrecking our planet - time to make them pay! Can you SIGN NOW to stop luxury emissions?

Just 1% of people are responsible for half of all toxic emissions from flying.

    • KecessaEnglish
      12·
      1 year ago

      Banning it for non essential needs isn’t when we’re facing a climate crisis that will displace millions (if not billions in the long run).

      • Zoolander@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        It is when it’s not a realistic solution and there are other ways of achieving better outcomes with a greater return on investment of time and resources.

        • KecessaEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          How do you think people lived until 70 years ago? That’s 70 years out of how many years of human history? I’m sure people could go back if they were forced to.

          You made the choice to move far from your family, that’s a consequence that comes with that choice and you still wanting to see them means you’re ready to shift the consequence of your choices on the people who will suffer the most of climate change.

            • KecessaEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              70+ years ago people just accepted the fact that living far from their family meant they wouldn’t see each other and they would need to communicate by mail.

              The fact is you live a long distance from your family, it’s your problem and those who will be affected by climate change the most shouldn’t have to pay for it and if it’s so important to see your family then you should move back.