Elon Musk's X, formerly called Twitter, disabled a feature that let users report misinformation about elections, a research organisation said on Wednesday, throwing fresh concern about false claims spreading just before major U.S. and Australian votes.
False. The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.
Try harder, you idiots are boring.
edit:
Also, the stupidity of the assertion that no one on Twitter has credibility is enhanced by the raw fact that possibly every single person who writes the articles that are shared here on Lemmy from sources deemed trustworthy by some percentage of you also happen to have Twitter accounts. At some point, it becomes an inherently ignorant argument.
Hey, fucktard, you can always block me if you can’t handle it. I block annoying people on here too, it’s really no big deal.
Apparently you cannot read, because I’ve expressly said under this post that it’s a dumpster fire, so obviously I don’t “like it so much”, dumbass.
What I’m arguing against, if you’re capable of removing your head from your colon long enough to comprehend something, is the clear assertion made here
that anyone who has a presence on Twitter has no credibility. TruthSocial? Sure I’ll agree with that, but it’s ignorant and dismissive of all the upstanding people who were on Twitter before Elon took over, and who actually have a loyal following or are part of communities that they chose not to ditch to go somewhere else.
I’m pretty sure for all us random nobodies, including you, it was no big deal to switch, but that’s not actually a valid reason to malign everyone still on twitter as having zero credibility.
Fuck off if you don’t like it. You don’t have to endure my presence, asswipe. The block button is right there for you to use, just like on Twitter.
The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.
No one made that implication except you, fucknuts! Just like I’ve said mulitple times: you’re the one making up these “implications” in your head, you’re the one crafting these strawmen, and then you’re the one that’s all bent out of shape!
If you’re too dumb to understand even with a provided screenshot, then you’re too dumb to be part of the conversation.
I’m sorry your comprehension level is this poor.
edit: what’s funny is that you’re coming back almost 24 hours later to continue arguing about it, and I’m the one bent out of shape about something? LOL
Not a single one, because we’re all anonymous random people. The only shred of credibility here is sharing something a fairly well validated website or news source… exactly like on Twitter. You act like no one on here posts questionable things that get removed. That is selective delusion for you.
Now look at your fucking screenshot, I’ll wait. Do you see where Junkers_Klunker claimed anything about lemmy, at all? You know why you don’t see them making suck a claim? Because it isn’t fucking there, fuckwad!
You’re the one that made the claim that lemmy is to be held in higher esteem, nobody else! That’s textbook strawman! Someone said chirping on xitter makes you less credible, and you pulled out the “and lemmy’s better in that regard” totally out of your ass! It’s right there in the pic you posted, nothing about lemmy in it!
what’s funny is that you’re coming back almost 24 hours later to continue arguing about it
And it’s even funnier that you’re replying back! (Btw, this is the first downtime I’ve had to read shitposts since yesterday, at the same time as yesterday, almost like that’s when I’m finally off of work or something; don’t go taking any detective jobs there, Columbo.)
False. The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.
Try harder, you idiots are boring.
edit:
Also, the stupidity of the assertion that no one on Twitter has credibility is enhanced by the raw fact that possibly every single person who writes the articles that are shared here on Lemmy from sources deemed trustworthy by some percentage of you also happen to have Twitter accounts. At some point, it becomes an inherently ignorant argument.
Removed by mod
Hey, fucktard, you can always block me if you can’t handle it. I block annoying people on here too, it’s really no big deal.
Apparently you cannot read, because I’ve expressly said under this post that it’s a dumpster fire, so obviously I don’t “like it so much”, dumbass.
What I’m arguing against, if you’re capable of removing your head from your colon long enough to comprehend something, is the clear assertion made here
that anyone who has a presence on Twitter has no credibility. TruthSocial? Sure I’ll agree with that, but it’s ignorant and dismissive of all the upstanding people who were on Twitter before Elon took over, and who actually have a loyal following or are part of communities that they chose not to ditch to go somewhere else.
I’m pretty sure for all us random nobodies, including you, it was no big deal to switch, but that’s not actually a valid reason to malign everyone still on twitter as having zero credibility.
Fuck off if you don’t like it. You don’t have to endure my presence, asswipe. The block button is right there for you to use, just like on Twitter.
You said, multiple times in different terms:
No one made that implication except you, fucknuts! Just like I’ve said mulitple times: you’re the one making up these “implications” in your head, you’re the one crafting these strawmen, and then you’re the one that’s all bent out of shape!
If you’re too dumb to understand even with a provided screenshot, then you’re too dumb to be part of the conversation.
I’m sorry your comprehension level is this poor.
edit: what’s funny is that you’re coming back almost 24 hours later to continue arguing about it, and I’m the one bent out of shape about something? LOL
Look at your original argument:
Now look at your fucking screenshot, I’ll wait. Do you see where Junkers_Klunker claimed anything about lemmy, at all? You know why you don’t see them making suck a claim? Because it isn’t fucking there, fuckwad!
You’re the one that made the claim that lemmy is to be held in higher esteem, nobody else! That’s textbook strawman! Someone said chirping on xitter makes you less credible, and you pulled out the “and lemmy’s better in that regard” totally out of your ass! It’s right there in the pic you posted, nothing about lemmy in it!
And it’s even funnier that you’re replying back! (Btw, this is the first downtime I’ve had to read shitposts since yesterday, at the same time as yesterday, almost like that’s when I’m finally off of work or something; don’t go taking any detective jobs there, Columbo.)