• dependencyInjection
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firstly I think if they let him in then they have to pay. Otherwise they couple have banned his entry.

    Also, why should regular Russians be punished for the actions of their government?

    I don’t remember being excluded from things when my government illegally invaded Iraq (UK).

    • sorrybookbroke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eh, I can understand why they don’t want to send the money. A large quantity will be taxed and used for military funds, on top of that whatever is bought bolsters the russian economy.

      The only reason why russian currency is as bad as it is now, thus making the war effort pretty harsh, is the sanctioning of and willing non-participation in the russian economy.

      Video games, tournament winnings, big macs, etc. all contribute to the general economy. Some economists would argue that’s the majority of it in this day and age.

      As for the punishment part, it’s sad that common people have to suffer but it’s the only way to bring a conclusion to this specific war. On the topic of iraq, I’d argue the UK and US should have had the same situation happen to them during their immoral invasions

    • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Putting pressure on the citizens may cause them to transmit that pressure upwards to their governments. You did not face such pressure because no one on Iraq’s side had any that they could meaningfully apply.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The answer to why you weren’t excluded but Russians are is simple: vae victis.

      Some countries do things that others don’t like. Other countries retaliate. But some retaliation is more effective than others.