• Drbreen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Omg this is just terrible. Obsession with celebrities gone mad.

  • tommy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why snoop is on every facking shitty project

    • funker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      cuz he a dumbass who thinks it’s still cool seeing his fuck face everywhere

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s a sellout that dgaf about being considered one. If I could get paid for letting someone use my face and do basically nothing else while high as a motherfucker all day, I would too.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    On Wednesday, Meta announced its consumer-friendly entry into the crowded AI chatbot landscape, The Verge reports.

    It is designed as a general-purpose chatbot that Meta says can help with planning trips, answering questions, and generating images from text prompts.

    Meta says the celebrity AIs went into limited beta on Wednesday, but we have not seen on-the-ground (or on-the-phone, as it were) reports of them in action yet.

    To ensure that these celebrity AI characters don’t go into Tay territory and spout embarrassing or harmful phrases, the company says it spent 6,000 hours in red teaming exercises to identify and address potential problematic uses of its assistants.

    This process included generating thousands of internal conversations to refine the assistant’s behavior and responses.

    However, The Verge hinted that this could change as the company aims to enhance its chatbot’s usefulness through “social integrations,” according to Ahmad Al-Dahle, Meta’s VP of generative AI.


    The original article contains 456 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!