The Liberal government is looking to cut almost $1 billion from the annual budget of the Department of National Defence — a demand the country’s top military commander says is prompting some “difficult” conversations within the military.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. Nuclear maintenance is very expensive.

    2. Nukes are actually terrible for defense purposes, since starting a nuclear war is a very ‘all or nothing’ affair, which means your choices are reduced to “Armageddon” or “Let the other side have their way” whenever a crisis comes up.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently, having nukes grants you the “You just crossed another red line!” defence.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is pretty good for stopping an outright invasion, though, if that’s your only concern. That’s basically what North Korea does. This is not Canada’s strategic position.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nukes are actually terrible for defense purposes, since starting a nuclear war is a very ‘all or nothing’ affair, which means your choices are reduced to “Armageddon” or “Let the other side have their way” whenever a crisis comes up.

      See: Russia and every final warning it has given over Ukraine. Since the US knows they have nothing conventionally and doesn’t buy that they’re going to end the world over a shipment of helmets or whatever it gets ignored.

    • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nukes are a good deterrent against attacks on civilians. There’s a reason Ukraine hasn’t started lobbing rockets at Russian cities.