On a large subreddit with more than 100K users, it’s an unspoken rule that if a thread has more than 200 comments, don’t bother making a new comment because it will get buried by the default comment ranking and no one will interact with it. Nobody uses the “new” ranking because you’re only going to see the meaningless one-sentence comments from people who don’t care about visibility. Only reply to the top comments in the thread after that point if you want to have a discussion.
I really appreciate that Lemmy’s default comment ranking lets the most upvoted comments fall off the top of the thread after a while so that newer comments appear at the top instead. It prevents threads from looking like circlejerks where all of the top comments agree with each other and encourages people to add their thoughts in a new comment instead of dogpiling on the top comment. This combined with disabling the global karma count is what improves the discussion experience from Reddit most, in my opinion.
I do like this too.
I want to point out that the “new” sort for comments, however, only takes into account the top level comments. So it may be hard to see the actual newest comments on a post that has aged a bit.
I put in an issue about it on GitHub dut it’s gotten no traction at all.
Isn’t that how it should work though? If you sort it by comment chains with the newest comment it will almost always be nearly the same as a top sort, since the most commented on comments will likely have the newest comments under them
If I want to see the newest comments, I’d want to see the top level comment which has the newest comment nested before anything else so that I can see the newest comment in context
I’m curious if this is what chat sorting does. Otherwise how is it different from new?
I don’t really get chat but I think the difference is that replies are looked at as separate comments, they’re decoupled from the parent comment.