Redout@lemmy.worldM to pissposting@lemmy.world · 1 year agowebp postinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down13
arrow-up1130arrow-down1imagewebp postinglemmy.worldRedout@lemmy.worldM to pissposting@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareAffine Connection@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWEBP’s lossy compression is horrendous.
minus-squareDavidGarcia@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoisn’t it much more advanced than jpeg, less blocky, more quality for the same size etc? perhaps websites are just setting the quality way too low. You can do that with jpeg too, it’s not a webp issue. Or why do you say that?
WEBP’s lossy compression is horrendous.
isn’t it much more advanced than jpeg, less blocky, more quality for the same size etc? perhaps websites are just setting the quality way too low. You can do that with jpeg too, it’s not a webp issue. Or why do you say that?