minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·edit-21 年前Why do all of these have the current date instead of the original?
minus-squareMrSebSinOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·1 年前It’s the date that they are posted on www.thefarside.com, they don’t provide the original publish dates.
minus-squareWarmSoda@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-21 年前Wouldn’t 1988 be the original published date? (It’s in the top right corner of the panel) I think it’s funny so many people can’t grasp the reason for the post title date though.
minus-squareJohnnyCanuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 年前What do you mean? Edit: OP has corrected “dye” to “date”…
minus-squareClay_pidginlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Yep, I was “translating” for them. As you say, it’s been fixed since.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Sorry, autocorrect changed “date” to “dye.”
Why do all of these have the current date instead of the original?
It’s the date that they are posted on www.thefarside.com, they don’t provide the original publish dates.
Wouldn’t 1988 be the original published date? (It’s in the top right corner of the panel)
I think it’s funny so many people can’t grasp the reason for the post title date though.
What do you mean?Edit: OP has corrected “dye” to “date”…The current DATE
It was edited, originally it said “dye”
Yep, I was “translating” for them. As you say, it’s been fixed since.
Sorry, autocorrect changed “date” to “dye.”