• Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ideas of „you can only own a building you live in“ and „companies can’t own residential buildings“ keep popping up in my head. Any reason that can’t be the solution?

      • Peaty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that if you need to rent you can’t because who do you rent from and where do they move to?

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably. Do you have any deprogramming resources handy? I‘d really like to have answers to people who think we need to have rich overlords to live appropriately.

        • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Anarchy Works” by Peter Gelderloos is one of the most compelling arguments I’ve ever seen for debunking the idea that capitalism and trade are normal behaviors for humans, and it’s honestly a smooth and pleasant read. Just the introduction alone is enough.

          Text: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works

          Audiobook Introduction: https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=Ht-2t2K68ls

          Audiobook Chapter 1: https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=gleMbLbbYv4

          Audiobook Chapter 2: https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=PUK_PAYNtmE

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for mentioning those. I‘ve checked out the book. It‘s not bad so far but I‘m not convinced just yet. :)

              • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Definitely. I do though. Books have always helped me to make sense of the things I see. Life has been rough and an early dip into psychology helped to stay mostly sane.

                Seeing that the world is still struggling although our efficiency is through the roof makes me think there must be a reason for it.

                Easiest answer is capitalism and we know that our gains accumulate at the top, not spread through the population. Still, I‘d like a more science based explanation and solutions.

                That way I can stand behind it without needing to follow blindly. Tried that. Doesn’t work for me. I hope it makes sense for you. :)

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The biggest trick is to break people out of their capitalist programming. Instead of rebuttals, just ask questions.

          “We need landlords”

          Why?

          “Because they provide housing, duh”

          Ok, but what about housing do they provide? They don’t build the buildings, they just own it.

          “Sure, but they do the repairs”

          They do, but why do tenants have to pay someone else to live there in case a repair is needed? What if the tenants owned the building together instead?

          • Ataraxia
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you think this is a simulation you can hack then I have news for you…

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Asking questions is a good idea. But I‘m convinced there is a lot more needed than this.

            I don’t think people think that we „need“ landlords, just that this is the system we have and they are not used to thinking for themselves.

            If you remember the kids in school that were popular: they mostly had cool sneakers or were sweet talkers of some kind. None of them actually were smart or did anything particularly interesting. Same goes for CEOs today.

            The reason we have capitalism (in my opinion) is because we are braindead as a group. The overwhelming majority lacks the skills to judge character, skill or even experience. We elect people without social accomplishments to public offices.

            That is also why hiring in companies is such a mess. Companies looking for specific keywords in a cv or letter will never get the best specialists because the people they hire are specialists and gaming the system, not at their job.

            We‘re naturally drawn to narcissists because they are good at selling themselves. We should be looking at the quiet person. They are normally 8 times better than the loudmouth.

            Have a good one. Sorry for the rant.

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have a definitive answer for that. Right now I‘d go with that, yes. The goal would be to move away from renting as you age. Everyone should own their living space sooner or later. There are options for this. Where I live you can rent-buy something. It’s renting but you also reduce the price you‘d pay for buying it. It’s very rare though afaik.