• Coelacanth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was about to post those exact words, hah. I’m never too excited about Spielberg but it’s definitely not bad by any means. I wouldn’t mourn it’s loss, but I’d much rather keep it than some of the stinkers on the calendar. Though I have some unpopular opinions about certain tracks, I think.

    • BaggySpandex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real circuit, beautiful scenery and GP history. I’m happy about it sticking around. Especially because my bold prediction is that places like Miami are not going to last.

      • dkn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say Miami will last. While hardcore fans may disagree, it has helped create a lot of new fans, equating to a lot more money.

        The last thing the FIA cares about right now is heritage

        • Coelacanth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hot take but I don’t even hate Miami as a track. Is it great? No. But it’s not worse than a 6/10. There are multiple heritage tracks that produce worse racing.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. It’s not the best racetrack, but it consistently produces better racing than nearly every street circuit. Any true racetrack that gets a long term spot on the calendar is great news in my opinion.

      • Coelacanth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be honest I wouldn’t mind seeing the back of Zandvoort and Mexico. I know they’re both proper circuits and the drivers love going round Zandvoort, but neither has produced good viewing in a long time.

        And this might be controversial but, when was the last time we had a banger dry race at Imola?