• Ookami38
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah? I don’t think I, of anyone else, proposed only housing ever.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Typically that’s how the “housing first” schemes I’ve seen work. It would be political suicide for a group to condone drug use in their public housing, and financial suicide to allow dogs (insurance would drop them) for example.

      It’s rarely as simple as “just do this simple thing and you solve this giant systemic problem”

      • Ookami38
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then that’s not housing first lol. Housing first means just that, housing FIRST. Before anything else. It’s worked in some countries, off the top of my head Finland. People don’t just get clean without safety, security, privacy, and dignity, and those things are practically impossible to achieve on the streets.

        This is one of those things that, yeah, actually. If we did the obvious, simple, humanitarian thing it’d work out to be drastically better for like, everyone except maybe the most well-off. The problem, as you alluded to, isn’t one of practicality but of politics.