• QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I blame the places that say you’re “adopting” the animal.

    No. Legally they are property, I’m giving you currency in exchange for personal property. Doesn’t matter how you have to word it for legal purposes, I’m buying it from you.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine calling living beings “property”. Your boss should also refer to you as their “property”, as they exchange money to own you for a portion of your life.

      You’re adopting, or you are a piece of shit. Can’t have it any other way. Next you’ll be like “well we used to own slaves and I don’t see why that went out of style”.

    • BrokebackHampton@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. Legally they are property

      According to which laws, exactly? My country has animal wellbeing laws that classify pets as companions and living beings, their legal status is explicitly above personal property.

      • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R.R. Co

        1897 U.S. Supreme Court holding that dogs are personal property. This has since been the prevailing law throughout the U.S.