• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    284
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well the solution here is to just use the superior distro, naturally.

    This post will surely upset nobody.

      • zaph
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        67
        ·
        1 year ago

        I ordered something from someone awhile back and it came with a free flash drive in the shape of a credit card. It had pictures of puppies on it so naturally it’s a puppy linux drive now.

        This is entirely irrelevant but hopefully someone gets a smile out of it.

      • spittingimage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Puppy’s awesome. I’ve used it on a laptop so old I had to install a bootloader in the MBR so it would boot from USB. It ran like a dream.

      • asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agreed. Debian Linux is just a children distro with a fibonacci logo that god created.

    • xeekei@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right! If a deb file exists then surely it’s in the AUR. ABS will repackage it seamlessly for you and then install it directly with Pacman.

    • Neko the gamerOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      is there a way to make it work like a rolling release of sorts? i’d want to use debian, but i don’t want to stay with old packages and wait 2 years for an update

      • Wulff
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You could use debian testing. It’s a somewhat “rolling-release” model. You will get more up to date packages with more stability too.

        You could also use unstable, but I wouldn’t recommend it personally.

        Edit: if you really need the most up to date version of some packages, you can pin them to use the unstable repo. This would be a pretty reasonable solution.

      • lwe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could just go with Debian unstable. I rarely ran into issues while running it in a rolling release style.

        Debian testing might also work for you. But it will have a freeze window before each release.

        • this_is_router@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As will have debian unstable. That’s the way it goes, for a few months every few years it slows down until the new stable gets released. Testing is just 10 days after unstable to avoid the biggest bugs.

          Never had big problems with debian unstable in 15 years though, as long as you use apt-listbugs

    • azvasKvklenko
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of such packages, be it deb rpm or really whatever, have their AUR entry, install and run fine on Arch.