• db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just smile and say “no thank you” and keep going. There’s nothing they can do unless they actually think you stole something and they don’t have the manpower to detain everyone who won’t stop for their receipt check.

    Note though that doesn’t apply to Sam’s Club or Costco or similar, if you’re a “member” there you agreed to the checks.

    • assaultpotato
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can’t detain you even if they think you have stolen, though (from a store policy perspective). There’s a reason all these stores train employees “observe don’t interfere”.

        • assaultpotato
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          As I mentioned, “from a store policies perspective”. The shrinkage isn’t worth the liability and risk for Walmart.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          so long as the shopkeeper has cause to believe that the person detained in fact committed, or attempted to commit, theft

          Shop keepers privilege can’t be used as a reason to detain customers for a receipt check. They don’t have “cause” as they did not see the person concealing anything.

          • TauZero@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s true! Receipt checks can get lost! I was replying to “They can’t detain you even if they think you have stolen” though. The “can’t” is a store policy thing, not a law thing.