Israel formally declared war on Hamas on Sunday, setting the stage for a major military operation in Gaza as fighting rages on Israeli soil. The declaration comes after Hamas, an Islamist militant group, launched a surprise assault this weekend that has so far killed over 600 Israelis.

Saturday was the deadliest day in decades for Israel and came after months of surging violence between Palestinians and Israelis, with the long-running conflict now heading into uncharted and dangerous new territory. Questions remain over how the Israeli military and intelligence apparatus appeared to be caught off guard in one of the country’s worst security failures.

Over 400 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza as Israel responds with airstrikes in the densely-inhabited enclave. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed retaliation, warning his country would take “mighty vengeance” and was readying for “a long and difficult war.”

He urged Palestinians living in Gaza to “leave now.”

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    From all the nations in the world one would expect that Jews should have learned that being an oppressor is not a recipe for peace.

    At the end of the day all comes to politics and media propaganda on both sides. Both sides think they are morally right, but the truth is that neither is and that in most cases innocent civilians are suffering the most as a result. Really sad!

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now what in the goddamn fuck does the jews have to learn from the nazis? What are you talking about man?

        • Quokka@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well instead of learning that say oppression of an entire peoples is bad, they’ve gone and done exactly that.

    • flossdaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel has never had a choice.

      Palestinians have NEVER agreed to any peace deal that wouldn’t fully destroy the state of Israel.

        • flossdaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          … Which was formally stolen from the Jews.

          I mean, my support for Israel has nothing to do with ancient history, but if your want to go down that road, you lose pretty spectacularly.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly land should belong to the people who live there, not a religious faction. How can Muslims and Jews, who both have claims to the area, ever live in peace when one religion wants to rule over the other? This is why most civilized countries seperate church and state.

            • kbotc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sounds great. When is the appropriate time to claim “The land belongs to those who live there” in this conflict?

            • Spzi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              While a great argument at first, it struggles when you consider strategic settling. Russia did so in Crimea and Donbas, Israel does too.

              If “land belongs to people who live there” was the decisive law, that would be a strong incentive for genocide and settlers, which we rather want to prevent.

              Because of that, I feel the acquisition must not be ignored.

            • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Careful, that logic can easily be used to justify prejudice and bigotry towards native populations.

              “We’ve had this land for hundreds of years, it’s ours now; doesn’t matter that it’s holy to you or that it was taken from you by force, we’ve been here long enough that it’s ours now.”

              To be clear, I’m not defending Israel; just that the argument that the land should belong to whoever lives there could easily be used to justify an American corporation bulldozing a Native American religious site because the site isn’t part of the tribal lands recognized by the US government.

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The f-- it’s not about who was there first, it’s about who was there last.

            Nobody gives a shit who lived where two thousand years ago. We’re talking about people being uprooted, who are still around to complain about it.