• HaiZhung@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im not sure what you are talking about, carbon taxes are one of the best ways to mitigate co2 emissions.

    If two producers produce the same good, but one of them emits less co2, that one will have higher profit margins.

    This is just one of the levers to nudge industries (who, let’s be real, are the main polluters) towards cleaner operations, and as far as I am informed, it’s one of the most effective ways.

    So this is good news. It’s good. We have to celebrate that, too, lest we all suffer from doomerism. Can more be done? Yes, there is always more to be done.

    But is this a good, important step?

    Definitely.

    • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the issues with carbon credits is they can be bought and sold. So if my company is more efficient, they can sell their remaining carbon credits to some other company which ends up polluting more.

      Carbon credits are basically a fine for polluting. If you can pay the fine, it’s business as usual.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah a lot of Tesla’s revenue is selling carbon credits because their processes are less polluting. They make ungodly amounts of money by doing this.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which makes the environmentaly friendly company more profitable - encouraging others to do the same.

        As more and more companies do this, the number of credits can be reduced to increase their price and keep the total emissions on a downward trend.