• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it still is, it’s just that game devs have found a recurring revenue model that works similarly to licensing: microtransactions.

    I can see Disney wanting back in now that MTX is socially acceptable. Milking the same IP for decades is exactly their MO.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see Disney wanting back in now that MTX is socially acceptable. Milking the same IP for decades is exactly their MO.

      They could then just be a publisher for their own IP and outsource development work. Disney gets to own all copyrights and revenue and pick an independent studio most suited for each game. Buying something like EA for around a similar or higher price than Microsoft spends for Activision is just stupid.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that makes sense too. I also wonder if they’re interested in having a game distribution platform as well. That’s in line with their Disney+ service they’ve been pushing. Buying EA means they get that and a bunch of popular games to seed it with.

        I guess we’ll see what they end up doing.