FfaerieOxide@kbin.social to Shower Thoughts@kbin.social · 1 year agoFor Something To Be Known You Have To Say It, And Someone Else Has to See Someone Else See You Say Itmessage-squaremessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1message-squareFor Something To Be Known You Have To Say It, And Someone Else Has to See Someone Else See You Say ItFfaerieOxide@kbin.social to Shower Thoughts@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
Fracturing communication channels hence makes it harder for things to be known (which was the point).
minus-squareShaunaTheDead@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think the study I read they considered animals to have failed the test if they found it funny that Christine looked in the first jar. Because it’s “silly” for her to look there.
minus-squareFfaerieOxide@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat seem like a lot of conclusion to draw off a monkey laughing but I am not an ape expert. What if Ari the Chimp is just That Guy You Know who finds weird shit funny?
minus-squareShaunaTheDead@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI wish I could find the original paper. It made sense the way they explained it.
I think the study I read they considered animals to have failed the test if they found it funny that Christine looked in the first jar. Because it’s “silly” for her to look there.
That seem like a lot of conclusion to draw off a monkey laughing but I am not an ape expert.
What if Ari the Chimp is just That Guy You Know who finds weird shit funny?
I wish I could find the original paper. It made sense the way they explained it.