• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    649 months ago

    You know what? Valve gets a pass here. They tried really hard to make Mac gaming a viable thing and it just didn’t work out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They tried but I wouldn’t describe it as trying hard.

      Steam client is still Intel only and runs via emulation on ARM Macs. They didn’t bother to update their games with 64-bit binaries so most of their catalogue stopped working years ago. Their only remaining “modern” game, Dota2, keeps going because it’s the only game to make that jump.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They’re not referring to any recent efforts. Valve’s push for gaming on mac happened years back, before the ARM transition was even a rumor. And even then, it was apple that stopped trying first, before valve did.

        Valve DID try, but you’re referring to things from AFTER they decided to cut their losses. Of course it’s lackluster.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Did Valve do anything after initial Steam and Source game ports? Steam client is in dire condition since forever and it’s been years since Catalina dropped support for 32-bit. If they provided 64-bit binaries their games would still be running through Rosetta2 on ARM Macs.

          It’s also reasonable to expect that at least Steam client would get ARM update 3 years after first M1 Macs even if they didn’t support their games anymore since Valve makes money predominantly on their cut of sales.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            179 months ago

            Sales of what ARM games? Apple only just released a bodged together “porting” toolkit and still expects devs to put in the legwork.

            Proton was originally intended to run on MacOS, too, but that was dropped as the workload was never gonna end. Apple pulling the rug out on stuff like openGL, and making it clear that vulcan on Mac was never happening.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -39 months ago

              Not sure what you’re getting at, there are Mac games released all the time on Steam and Valve keeps getting their cut. The bare minimum anyone expects is that Steam itself gets ported to ARM because it’s a web browser and those do horrendously when ran through Rosetta.

              ARM Macs can still play 64-bit Intel games of which there is significant back catalogue and new games are released with ARM binaries even on Steam.

              • MentalEdge
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                The point is that apple is expecting a chicken to hatch out of an egg that doesn’t exist.

                Devs will use Metal and apples other proprietary systems on mobile, because a gaming market that has passed critical mass already exists there.

                Apple is expecting devs to be willing to do the same on desktop and laptop, before the gaming market for those platforms have hit critical mass. Yes, there are “some” games, but right now, apple simply isn’t doing what’s necessary for it to take off for real. Devs, gamers, and Valve, know that.

                Valve was willing to put in the resources back when apple was doing the same, but they stopped long ago and have only been doing the bare minimum of lip service, since. So, Valve packed up, and became re-focused on linux instead.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  09 months ago

                  I’m expecting Valve to keep Steam operational since I own plenty of Mac games there. Valve doesn’t require anything from Apple to deliver a working storefront.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I wonder if part of the reason is that apple deprecated opengl on mac os and replaced it with their property graphics api Metal. I image it would be a lot of work to port the source the engine to Metal just for a small amount of users.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 months ago

      Not just OpenGL, they also moved to ARM64 CPU architecture in 2020, which isn’t any longer out of the box compatible with x86_x64 software. It requires extra work and optimization. Using a Mac for gaming is like shooting yourself in the foot. This is also unlikely to change, as moving to ARM64 would lose us all backwards compatibility. I always considered this move of Apple to be a mistake.

      • fmstrat
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Gaming is far from their target market. ARM64 was a smart move for their market. The most commonly used apps are all faster with better battery life, and the transition was pretty smooth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          Yeah, when I had a Mac it felt like a big smartphone, and it’s pretty good at being that.

        • @mushroom
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          I have an m1 Mac and the Rosetta 2 layer is insanely performant. There is some performance loss but I’d hardly call it significant. It’s imperceptible to me.

      • @mindbleach
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        I’m both shocked that nobody’s glued together Unicorn Engine and Wine to make WinTel software run on anything, and obviously disinclined to dive into that deep dark hole myself.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        Yup. The only reason I play games on macOS is because work gives me a Mac and I want to play games occasionally on it. My main gaming rig is Linux, macOS is just there for the odd 30-min gaming break.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 months ago

      This is a big one. Another one is that developing software for Macs is a huge headache compared to Windows, Linux, and BSD. The tooling simply feels much more awkward to use than most things available on other platforms, and the application packaging is so easy to mess up (not that every developer doesn’t forget the occasional DLL…)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    379 months ago

    Macs are not for gaming, Apple made that very clear.

    Only now that they’ve seen how much income they could have made, have they tried to backtrack.

    Long live Linux Gaming.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      TBF, they’d rather kill gaming on Macs entirely than not be the platform all those games are purchased through.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Could also be because of the Arm chips which add more burden on the developers who have to account not only for another OS but also for a completely different CPU instruction set.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      How did Larian do it? Its not really a major studio, just average size. And Baldurs Gate 3 runs perfectly on it. The Mac Book Pro with the M2 gets rock staple 60 FPS on max in 1440p - even though its not the most demanding game, still really impressive for a Laptop.

      • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Not taking anyone’s side here, I’m merely saying that it adds burden (and thus costs) on the developers. Now whether the additional burden is worth it depends on how big the burden is (do they have lots of hand-optimized x86 assembly? or are they using platform agnostic libraries?) and the expected return on that investment, and companies will see these things differently. For Valve it wasn’t worth it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      This is probably not as big of a deal as the lack of common APIs like Vulcan. I doubt Valve has much (if any) raw x86 code in their game engine, and it would probably compile to arm just fine. You still have to set up a new build chain for this, though, which is a pain.

  • Devil
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69 months ago

    I’m thankful it’s Linux native (still not unproblematic to run tho), so I feel for the Mac people. It’s a bad feeling to be left out. I still want to play lost ark for example!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      no?, Valve tried, never gave any result, and linux surpasses it in a year of thet launch of steam deck, Apple also don’t help fucking with opengl,vulkan and switching to Arm

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -49 months ago

    If you make weed legal, the number of people breaking the law will go down.

    If you don’t make any games for an OS, you won’t have any players on that OS.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -159 months ago

    The article might as well be “Valve Says Counter-Strike 2 for macOS Not Happening Because We Have a Vested Interest In Selling Steam Decks” just as Apple isn’t porting iMessage (and other apps) to Android because they have a vested interest in selling iPhones.