Ok, now convince that your entire rant wasn’t just a language learning model’s hallucination of what sounds like a reasonable explanation, but doesn’t actually make any sense or have any grounding in reality. Because that’s what it sounds like. I was going to start picking apart your explanation, but there’s just so much wrong and inconsistent that I gave up.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought this. Their explanation is weirdly verbose yet conceptually wrong on almost every level. There’s been a lot of people in this thread who fundamentally don’t understand how a microwave works in general to be honest.
Ok, now convince that your entire rant wasn’t just a language learning model’s hallucination of what sounds like a reasonable explanation, but doesn’t actually make any sense or have any grounding in reality. Because that’s what it sounds like. I was going to start picking apart your explanation, but there’s just so much wrong and inconsistent that I gave up.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought this. Their explanation is weirdly verbose yet conceptually wrong on almost every level. There’s been a lot of people in this thread who fundamentally don’t understand how a microwave works in general to be honest.
It’s funny, several people arguing about how a microwave doesn’t work because none of them know how.
Yeah, turns out most of what I thought about the process by which the food heats was bollocks.
Reference: http://www.sfu.ca/phys/346/121/resources/physics_of_microwave_ovens.pdf
I’ve edited my post.