- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
In response to chip export restrictions from the US and Europe, China has retaliated by imposing export controls on two essential semiconductor manufacturing elements, gallium and germanium, adding another dimension to the ongoing global battle over chipmaking technology control.
- China has announced export controls on two rare elements, gallium and germanium, which are essential for semiconductor manufacturing. This move is in response to the US and Europe restricting chip exports to China.
- Starting August 1, exporters of these raw materials will require special permission from the state to ship them out of the country, according to China’s Ministry of Commerce.
- Both gallium and germanium are used in several products, including computer chips and solar panels, and are listed as critical raw materials by the European Union. China is the world’s largest gallium producer and a significant producer and exporter of germanium.
- The Dutch government recently imposed new restrictions on exports of some semiconductor equipment, provoking a harsh reaction from Beijing. Consequently, ASML, Europe’s largest tech firm, will need to apply for export licenses for products used to manufacture microchips.
- Japan, the US, and Italy have also taken measures to restrict Chinese companies’ access to chips and chipmaking equipment. This has been seen as an attempt to limit the Chinese government’s access to sensitive chip technology.
- The new policy was interpreted as retaliation by a state-owned newspaper, China Daily, which suggested that critics should question why the US and the Netherlands have taken similar actions against China.
- China’s announcement comes just before US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s visit to Beijing from July 6 to July 9, where she will meet with senior Communist Party officials.
Do you really think that the colonial mindset of the US and European governments just went away after the decolonization process of the 60’s and 70’s? (yes, maybe you didn’t knew, but there were still legitimate colonies until 70 years ago, not 200 years). The United States still refers as latinamerica as “their backyard” and is still messing with the countries that dosen’t just follow their orders as ghey want.
Well, considering the previous colonial powers decided to no longer be colonial powers while they were still in a position to do pretty much whatever they wanted: Yes. Their mindset changed. That’s why they gave up the colonies, not because they suddenly became incapable of holding them.
Lmao, this is “white people on all its wisdom decided to give freedom to the slaves” level of thinking.
If they decided to left the colonies were not because they had a change of heart, but because the situation was unsustainable and they were just spending the extracted resources on military actions to keep the population on line (in conjunction with their own population that could see how fucked up the situation was an pressed the government to left them go).
And they didn’t left their colonies on their own, they moved to a neo colonialism system, where a local elite exploit the resources in behalf of the colonial power.
This is exactly the change of mindset I’m referring to.
Also: The push against slavery was, in fact, largely made by white elites that could see how fucked up slavery was. Not because they were smarter, more kind or anything than the slaves themselves, but because slaves in all societies for thousands of years have tried to end slavery and failed. For the institutional move to ban slavery to succeed, support from the ruling elites was necessary. So yes, slavery was successfully abolished because certain people had a change of heart.