As the title suggests I am stuck understanding what’s going on here and I’m pretty pissed off right now.
So I had a Minecraft world (Java) running on windows 11 and a few weeks ago I was playing for a few hours and when I came to save the game it just kept spinning and I noticed the clock on the desktop had stopped about 90 mins before and thus it corrupted my game save and I lost the world.
I was finding the motivation to play (work all day on a pc so sometimes it’s hard) as it is, and so I was reluctant to start a new world. A couple of weeks later I started a new world and put in an hour here and there. Today I’m playing again for a few hours and come to save again and low and behold the same thing happened. Now I’m too frustrated to check if this world is also dead (last time the folder was there but it never showed in game).
Any ideas what is going on here or where I can begin to investigate once I get the motivation to turn the pc on again.
The pc is a few months old. Built myself and the specs if needed are:
- Asus PRIME B550-PLUS Mobo
- 32 GB Corsair Vengeance RAM
- Ryzen 7 5600x
- Gigabyte GeForce rtx 4060 GPU
- Nvme storage
- AIO water cooler.
As an aside temps are higher than I want. Like 60+ on load (pc) and game launch, but does settle around 45 once Minecraft is loaded in.
If you could point me to the posting rules, I would be grateful so I can better find the best community next time.
I assumed AskLemmy implied you could ask anything, evidently I am wrong but I’m happy to learn how to understand the posting rules for each community.
I cannot point you to the rules, because every lemmy client is different. But if you are on the website with a desktop browser, it’s in the sidebar. I wrote a quick guide about this topic a short while ago: https://nx2.site/guide-to-the-ask-communities
Ah, so I found the rules for this sub and I don’t see one that would have prevented me from asking my question.
The rules said no support for lemmy questions, which mine wasn’t.
I guess you could argue rule 5 if you’re being pedantic, the rule about creates discussion. Which I would argue my question did.
Thanks for pointing me in the correct place.