• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    92 pounds. Jesus.

    That one of the few drugs I’ve never seen in person.

    • Zeppo
      cake
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      That is a lot for coke, I guess. Middlin’ for meth. I lived in San Bernardino country for a few months (for some reason) and was amazed at the amounts they were busting there. Many labs are apparently up north past the mountain around Victorville and Hesperia. They nabbed 125 lbs in town one day… the one I remember sounding like a lot was 500 pounds of meth, and 250 gallons of liquid meth.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        08 months ago

        I’ve seen lots of meth. Meth is easy and cheap to make. Coke is the one ive yet to see in person.

        • Zeppo
          cake
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          Well… definitely plenty of it out there. Overlapping but different circles with people who would do meth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If we repealed measure 110 this wouldn’t be happening because cops would have the ability to arrest criminals!

    ^^^/s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      I’ve donated a lot of money to organizations that provide free drug testing at music festivals because harm reduction works.

      But I’ve also seen the lives of friends and coworkers ruined by fent. I’m for decriminalization but I’d be a fool to want unregulated, not properly dosed, fent pushed on the streets to the unsuspecting.

      Please tell me more about how to fix issues caused by a cheap synthetic that’s 100x stronger than morphine?

      What’s the solution? Tax and regulate? Safe injection sites? Dispensaries? Lockout laws?

      Or will just leaving drug dealers alone to do their thing work out?

      Or maybe libertarian police? https://www.newyorker.com/humor/daily-shouts/l-p-d-libertarian-police-department

      • Zeppo
        cake
        link
        English
        68 months ago

        For overdoses, a regulated, safe supply. People don’t overdose because it’s inherently more dangerous than other opiates, they do because it’s difficult to tell how concentrated a random powder is, and the people selling it aren’t great at calculating concentration. Being sold by the same people as drugs like cocaine also leads to people using cocaine that is accidentally/intentionally contaminated with fentanyl, when they didn’t intend to use opiates at all. Hospitals use fentanyl all the time without accidentally killing people because it comes in a safe, predictable, consistently measured form. Plus people didn’t even want to start using fentanyl instead of heroin, dilaudid or morphine, it’s just that the market switched to that because it’s cheap, easy to synthesize, and easier to transport.

        For the dealing side, sort of legalization (like, very grim medical dispensaries with access to treatment) would be the worst nightmare for the people who profit from selling and trafficking it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Taking 80k pills off the market, while it sounds like a lot, will barely make a dent. It may raise the street price by a few cents on average. I’m all for drug interdiction for other reasons but it barely makes a dent in the drug supply. These seizures are acceptable losses for cartels.

        I like safe consumption sites, plus expansions in access to narcan, suboxone, and methadone. Community outreach to users using recovering folks. We’re doing many of the right things, but we just need a lot more of them.