Good news, this shit has zero impact on the game you’re trying to watch.
Which is why banning it is so stupid. If you’re such a huge bigot that being reminded that people who are different from you exist, and that reminder is enough to ruin hockey for you then that’s on you.
Welp as other industries have learned when you pander to a small minority and alienate other fans your industry starts to collapse. Look at comic books or bud light.
You throw words like bigot around. But your just showing your ignorance. I just want to be able to enjoy entertainment without having causes shoved down my throat.
Would you be happy of the NHL allows Isreal flag tape and do Isreal pride night’s? I don’t want that shit either.
None of those give any connections to the drop in sales and then being inclusive.
The whole economy has been slowing down and people have less spare money. Did you know that when people have less money to spend the first thing they stop spending money on are luxuries.
IDK, I’m kind of mixed on this one. On the one hand, I don’t mind seeing rainbow tape on their stick (I wear pride stuff during pride month), but I’d disagree with seeing political ads or even branding for products.
There should absolutely be some rules here, and a no tolerance policy is the easiest to enforce fairly. If they allow rainbow flags for expression, they should probably also allow political and commercial expression as well. So I’d rather have a no tolerance policy than a subjective one that many will disagree with.
“I wear pride stuff during pride month” is the new “I have a black friend”.
People wanting to be treated equally shouldn’t be seen as political speech. Increasing visibility for a group of people who have historically been largely made to hide shouldn’t be seen as radical.
Based on your logic, we should also no longer allow anything that shows support for the cishet community. No more mention of the player’s wives and children. I think that sounds fair, right?
I’m not saying it’s political speech, I even mentioned commercial speech in there as well. I’m just saying that in a professional sports setting, it should be about the game, not whatever social, political, or economic issue the player is interested in.
No more mention of the player’s wives and children
Agreed. I don’t see any reason for a player to have their wife or children displayed on their sticks or anywhere on their uniform while playing. If there’s a section for a bio somewhere (like when they’re being announced coming onto the ice), it could mention their support for LGBT issues or their family life or whatever. They’d get a small blurb that can say whatever they want, perhaps audited for hate speech or commercial ads that are in conflict with whoever is advertising for that game.
But I don’t really see any reason for players to be advertising anything on their sticks or jerseys while playing. Whether a player is LGBT or supports LGBT issues should have no bearing on how they play the game.
I didn’t say there wasn’t, I said there shouldn’t. If players want to make political or social commentary, they should do it outside of the game itself. But once they’re suited up and playing, it should be all about the game.
I’m just saying that a sporting event is not the place for social or political commentary, it’s a place for sports. I also think we shouldn’t play the national anthem as well. I feel the same about actors in a play, so I’m not treating sports special here.
If they want to push for some cause they believe in outside of their performance time, that’s fine, but during a performance, they should merely perform.
What players do off the ice is irrelevant, what matters here is that there are teams that still want to do pride warmups, but they can’t.
You haven’t yet given a good reason for why teams shouldn’t be able to use pride related jerseys during warmups, and that’s because there really isn’t a good reason.
I didn’t say it’s political, I just said it distracts from the game.
I can maybe see it being allowed if all players have the same marking (e.g. an LGBT awareness week), but if each player can have something different, then that needs to be policed, which means someone needs to decide what is allowed and what isn’t. Any time that happens, you get stupid issues like this where they’ll allow one form of speech and disallow another, and the whole thing gets political.
So instead of making a list of things that are allowed, just have a policy of no speech on uniforms and sticks. That’s simple and keeps focus on the game instead of whatever cause a player believes in.
If they allow rainbow flags for expression, they should probably also allow political and commercial expression as well.
I just don’t understand where you’re going with this. How is a rainbow, an expression of support for a range of identities of people, equally unacceptable in a sports environment as a literal “Vote [name] for President!” sticker or a political party flag?
It just feels like you’re viewing the existence of certain people as “political.”
I also said players shouldn’t have symbols of other things as well. I named politics and companies, but the same fits for religions, philosophies, etc.
If you’re playing a professional sport, acting in a play, etc, you should wear your uniform or costume, and then focus on the performance. If it’s not related to the game, players shouldn’t do it during the game.
I’m completely fine with players wearing rainbow flags or wherever during interviews and other appearances, that’s completely fine. I just think the game should be all about the game, not about individual players’ beliefs.
I think you’re missing one important thing about the NHL and Pro sports in general, it’s never been about the game. It’s entertainment to make money, that’s all it’s ever been. There is no “purity” or “for the love of the gave” just business.
Those are two different types of political, one is about government policy, and the other is about drama in some group. I’m saying that if there are rules to what kinds of speech are allowed, then the choice of what types of speech is allowed becomes political. So if they allow pink for breast cancer awareness but not rainbows for LGBT awareness, we end up with this type of conflict.
It’s better to just not allow expression like that during games.
it’s never been about the game. It’s entertainment to make money
True, but it’s entertainment where the game is front and center. It’s not like comedy where I’m there specifically for the jokes and social commentary. I’m there to watch the game and my favorite players perform, not see/hear their political, social, religious, etc views. If I want that, I can watch interviews with them, read books by/about them, or engage with whatever charities/causes they endorse.
Why are you so insistent that no focus be taken away from the game? Would a few players having differently-colored sticks or a little patch on their uniform really take your attention from the game?
Like, they’re not out there doing a Broadway on ice performance, they’re just putting some tape on sticks. The game doesn’t change because of some tape. If you have trouble focusing on the game because the rainbow tape is distracting, that’s probably a you issue. If you don’t like what you see on your screen, you can either ignore it, or change the channel. Easy as that.
It’s not the differently colored sticks themselves that’s the problem, it’s the commentary and whatnot surrounding it. What if all players except one put rainbow flags on their sticks? The commentators will just talk about that one player all game instead of highlights about the game itself. Perhaps it’ll devolve into a weird contest about who can put the most ridiculous thing on their stick and get away with it. IDK, I just don’t see how any of that adds to the experience.
I just don’t want any of that nonsense involved in sports. It’s already commercialized like crazy, I’d really rather not have any more distractions from what I’m they’re to watch: high level play in a sport I enjoy watching.
That’s it. I don’t care if they’re advertising cute kittens or world peace, it’s just not relevant to the game.
That said, if the NFL or their team has a special night for some cause and all players wear it, I’m absolutely fine with that. That can be rainbow flags, pink tape, etc, provided all players have it or none of them do. But if you allow advertising by players of various causes, that’s going to get political (not political policy, just drama within the league).
What if all players except one put rainbow flags on their sticks?
So what? Ignore it.
The commentators will just talk about that one player all game instead of highlights about the game itself.
Doubt it. And even if they do, so what? Ignore it, or mute it. It’s the game that matters, right, not the commentary?
Perhaps it’ll devolve into a weird contest about who can put the most ridiculous thing on their stick and get away with it.
What an absolutely insane take. These guys are professional athletes, some of the most competitive people in the entire world. They’re not going to introduce a “weird contest” sideshow into their sport just because.
I just don’t want any of that nonsense involved in sports. It’s already commercialized like crazy, I’d really rather not have any more distractions from what I’m they’re to watch: high level play in a sport I enjoy watching.
Another insane take. You’ve repeatedly compared voicing concern for a cause and commercialism. But those things aren’t remotely comparable. They’re not advertising gay pride, they’re showing support for a marginalized group. The fact that you’re lumping that into the same category of aggravations as commercials is saying a lot about you.
That’s it. I don’t care if they’re advertising cute kittens or world peace, it’s just not relevant to the game.
Then just ignore it. If you really, truly, actually do not care, it shouldn’t be hard to simply ignore it.
provided all players have it or none of them do.
Another insane take you keep bringing up. Why are you ok with players being forced to represent a certain thing on certain days? Would you wear a pride shirt on your company’s mandated pride celebration day, and then get mad if someone wears a pride shirt on another day? Something you could very easily just ignore? If so, then again, that’s saying a lot about you. It says you’re “willing” to “allow” people to “voice their support”, but only in ways that are unobtrusive and approved by you. At best, that’s selfish, and at worst, it’s authoritarian.
The league will continue to look closely at any third-party logos, as last season saw everything from nonapproved movie cover artwork to podcast logos to charity organization icons sneak onto the hardwood.
As you said, they’re competitive professionals, so there’s going to be a lot of rule bending and breaking. Things have to be approved by the league, so it’s likely going to get political as to what’s allowed and what’s not allowed.
Would you wear a pride shirt on your company’s mandates pride celebration day, and then get mad if someone wears a pride shirt on another day?
If they’re customer facing and intended to be in a uniform that represents the company, yes. If you’re working the front desk or something, you need to be wearing something company approved. If they’re not customer facing, I honestly don’t care what they wear, unless it’s a day when the higher ups are visiting or something.
Athletes represent the league and team they play for, and thus should wear an approved uniform. During practice or warmups is a different story, and they should be free to be more expressive. But once the game starts, they need to abide a more strict policy.
you’re “willing” to “allow”
I’m not in any kind of position of authority here, so I’m not allowing or disallowing anything. I’m merely expressing what I think should and should not be policy of a sports organization. In my opinion, professional sports leagues should be all about the game, and that’s it. I would also prefer to eliminate all forms of advertising during the game, and only allow it before or after the game (or perhaps during halftime or period change breaks or whatever).
at worst, it’s authoritarian
The NHL isn’t a government, it’s a sports league. If players don’t like the rules, they can leave, nobody is compelling anyone with force to do anything.
I don’t care about the existing NBA rules - we’re talking about why you personally have an issue with athletes representing causes during games.
Things have to be approved by the league, so it’s likely going to get political as to what’s allowed and what’s not allowed.
You’re making a huge leap here. Why would it get political? From my view, sports leagues have it very easy when it comes to defining what a player can wear during play: as long as it doesn’t cause a safety risk, affect your competitive advantage or the integrity of the game, or cause the opponent visible confusion, it should be fair game. Does this require some official to make a judgement call? Sure. But that’s literally what officiated sports revolve around - a bunch of judgement calls.
If you’re working the front desk or something, you need to be wearing something company approved. If they’re not customer facing, I honestly don’t care what they wear, unless it’s a day when the higher ups are visiting or something.
The pride shirt in my example is provided and approved by the company. If the company says it’s ok to show your pride support on a specific day, why is it not ok to show that support on non-designated days? And don’t you see the unfair treatment you’re suggesting here? I’m just so baffled at why you care so much what other people wear? It seems like this is a hill you’re willing to die on, even though you’ve mentioned you’re willing to have your “opinion challenged” a few times. For someone trying to come off as open mined you seem like you have your heels dug in, and you haven’t really given any reasons why, aside from weak platitudes.
I’m not in any kind of position of authority here, so I’m not allowing or disallowing anything.
C’mon, now you’re just being pedantic. You approve of some authority being able to control the appearance of the people they have authority over, that’s obviously the intent of that phrase, I just didn’t want to type it all out because it’s overly wordy. You’re not discussing the point anymore at this point, you’re disingenuously attacking a turn of phrase.
I’m merely expressing what I think should and should not be policy of a sports organization.
And I’m trying to get you to answer the simple question, why? Why do you think this, other than because of your own perceived personal inconvenience?
In my opinion, professional sports leagues should be all about the game, and that’s it.
I’m sorry to inform you that sports have never, and will never, be that. Almost all entertainment has always had an opinion, some sort of slant, or a message they’re trying to get across. If people didn’t like the message, they ignored it or stopped consuming that entertainment. That’s still an option you can exercise today.
The NHL isn’t a government, it’s a sports league.
Pedantry, again, and disingenuously putting words in my mouth.
If players don’t like the rules, they can leave, nobody is compelling anyone with force to do anything.
This has to be irony, right? Please tell me you’re being ironic right now. Because if you’re not being ironic, wow, what a hypocrite you are.
And I didn’t say it is. I just said it isn’t relevant in a sporting event. But more specifically, I said any kind of speech from a player isn’t relevant in a sporting event unless it’s directly about the game (e.g. a poor call).
Good news, this shit has zero impact on the game you’re trying to watch.
Which is why banning it is so stupid. If you’re such a huge bigot that being reminded that people who are different from you exist, and that reminder is enough to ruin hockey for you then that’s on you.
Welp as other industries have learned when you pander to a small minority and alienate other fans your industry starts to collapse. Look at comic books or bud light.
You throw words like bigot around. But your just showing your ignorance. I just want to be able to enjoy entertainment without having causes shoved down my throat.
Would you be happy of the NHL allows Isreal flag tape and do Isreal pride night’s? I don’t want that shit either.
Bud light and comics are doing just fine.
Who told you otherwise? You might need to reevaluate your news sources.
You must be living under a rock
https://boundingintocomics.com/2023/06/27/comic-shop-owner-admits-new-marvel-and-dc-comics-sales-are-increasingly-slowing-down/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robsalkowitz/2019/10/08/surprising-new-data-shows-comic-readers-are-leaving-superheroes-behind/?sh=534b43964d68
https://www.comicsbeat.com/idw-layoffs-goes-dark-on-the-nyse/
Sales are going to continue to decline , they are down again over 2022
None of those give any connections to the drop in sales and then being inclusive.
The whole economy has been slowing down and people have less spare money. Did you know that when people have less money to spend the first thing they stop spending money on are luxuries.
IDK, I’m kind of mixed on this one. On the one hand, I don’t mind seeing rainbow tape on their stick (I wear pride stuff during pride month), but I’d disagree with seeing political ads or even branding for products.
There should absolutely be some rules here, and a no tolerance policy is the easiest to enforce fairly. If they allow rainbow flags for expression, they should probably also allow political and commercial expression as well. So I’d rather have a no tolerance policy than a subjective one that many will disagree with.
“I wear pride stuff during pride month” is the new “I have a black friend”.
People wanting to be treated equally shouldn’t be seen as political speech. Increasing visibility for a group of people who have historically been largely made to hide shouldn’t be seen as radical.
Based on your logic, we should also no longer allow anything that shows support for the cishet community. No more mention of the player’s wives and children. I think that sounds fair, right?
I’m not saying it’s political speech, I even mentioned commercial speech in there as well. I’m just saying that in a professional sports setting, it should be about the game, not whatever social, political, or economic issue the player is interested in.
Agreed. I don’t see any reason for a player to have their wife or children displayed on their sticks or anywhere on their uniform while playing. If there’s a section for a bio somewhere (like when they’re being announced coming onto the ice), it could mention their support for LGBT issues or their family life or whatever. They’d get a small blurb that can say whatever they want, perhaps audited for hate speech or commercial ads that are in conflict with whoever is advertising for that game.
But I don’t really see any reason for players to be advertising anything on their sticks or jerseys while playing. Whether a player is LGBT or supports LGBT issues should have no bearing on how they play the game.
How naive to think that there has never been any social or political commentary in sports. No Jackie Robinson, no Muhammad Ali, nothing. Right?
I didn’t say there wasn’t, I said there shouldn’t. If players want to make political or social commentary, they should do it outside of the game itself. But once they’re suited up and playing, it should be all about the game.
That sums up what you’re saying, right?
I guess, if you take it to an extreme.
I’m just saying that a sporting event is not the place for social or political commentary, it’s a place for sports. I also think we shouldn’t play the national anthem as well. I feel the same about actors in a play, so I’m not treating sports special here.
If they want to push for some cause they believe in outside of their performance time, that’s fine, but during a performance, they should merely perform.
Are you Laura Ingraham? Because this sounds pretty much just like her saying “shut up and dribble”.
What players do off the ice is irrelevant, what matters here is that there are teams that still want to do pride warmups, but they can’t.
You haven’t yet given a good reason for why teams shouldn’t be able to use pride related jerseys during warmups, and that’s because there really isn’t a good reason.
I have no problem with teams using pride related jerseys during warmups and practices.
I thought this article was mostly discussing pride tape use during games.
True you’re right.
I assumed this was the extension of the pride related equipment.
It just being tape used on stickes makes this even more unreasonable to be upset over. 😂
How is this political? Is wearing pink for cancer political? Boggles my mind anyone would see it this way.
I didn’t say it’s political, I just said it distracts from the game.
I can maybe see it being allowed if all players have the same marking (e.g. an LGBT awareness week), but if each player can have something different, then that needs to be policed, which means someone needs to decide what is allowed and what isn’t. Any time that happens, you get stupid issues like this where they’ll allow one form of speech and disallow another, and the whole thing gets political.
So instead of making a list of things that are allowed, just have a policy of no speech on uniforms and sticks. That’s simple and keeps focus on the game instead of whatever cause a player believes in.
I just don’t understand where you’re going with this. How is a rainbow, an expression of support for a range of identities of people, equally unacceptable in a sports environment as a literal “Vote [name] for President!” sticker or a political party flag?
It just feels like you’re viewing the existence of certain people as “political.”
I also said players shouldn’t have symbols of other things as well. I named politics and companies, but the same fits for religions, philosophies, etc.
If you’re playing a professional sport, acting in a play, etc, you should wear your uniform or costume, and then focus on the performance. If it’s not related to the game, players shouldn’t do it during the game.
I’m completely fine with players wearing rainbow flags or wherever during interviews and other appearances, that’s completely fine. I just think the game should be all about the game, not about individual players’ beliefs.
Is it political or not chief lol?
I think you’re missing one important thing about the NHL and Pro sports in general, it’s never been about the game. It’s entertainment to make money, that’s all it’s ever been. There is no “purity” or “for the love of the gave” just business.
Those are two different types of political, one is about government policy, and the other is about drama in some group. I’m saying that if there are rules to what kinds of speech are allowed, then the choice of what types of speech is allowed becomes political. So if they allow pink for breast cancer awareness but not rainbows for LGBT awareness, we end up with this type of conflict.
It’s better to just not allow expression like that during games.
True, but it’s entertainment where the game is front and center. It’s not like comedy where I’m there specifically for the jokes and social commentary. I’m there to watch the game and my favorite players perform, not see/hear their political, social, religious, etc views. If I want that, I can watch interviews with them, read books by/about them, or engage with whatever charities/causes they endorse.
Why are you so insistent that no focus be taken away from the game? Would a few players having differently-colored sticks or a little patch on their uniform really take your attention from the game?
Like, they’re not out there doing a Broadway on ice performance, they’re just putting some tape on sticks. The game doesn’t change because of some tape. If you have trouble focusing on the game because the rainbow tape is distracting, that’s probably a you issue. If you don’t like what you see on your screen, you can either ignore it, or change the channel. Easy as that.
It’s not the differently colored sticks themselves that’s the problem, it’s the commentary and whatnot surrounding it. What if all players except one put rainbow flags on their sticks? The commentators will just talk about that one player all game instead of highlights about the game itself. Perhaps it’ll devolve into a weird contest about who can put the most ridiculous thing on their stick and get away with it. IDK, I just don’t see how any of that adds to the experience.
I just don’t want any of that nonsense involved in sports. It’s already commercialized like crazy, I’d really rather not have any more distractions from what I’m they’re to watch: high level play in a sport I enjoy watching.
That’s it. I don’t care if they’re advertising cute kittens or world peace, it’s just not relevant to the game.
That said, if the NFL or their team has a special night for some cause and all players wear it, I’m absolutely fine with that. That can be rainbow flags, pink tape, etc, provided all players have it or none of them do. But if you allow advertising by players of various causes, that’s going to get political (not political policy, just drama within the league).
So what? Ignore it.
Doubt it. And even if they do, so what? Ignore it, or mute it. It’s the game that matters, right, not the commentary?
What an absolutely insane take. These guys are professional athletes, some of the most competitive people in the entire world. They’re not going to introduce a “weird contest” sideshow into their sport just because.
Another insane take. You’ve repeatedly compared voicing concern for a cause and commercialism. But those things aren’t remotely comparable. They’re not advertising gay pride, they’re showing support for a marginalized group. The fact that you’re lumping that into the same category of aggravations as commercials is saying a lot about you.
Then just ignore it. If you really, truly, actually do not care, it shouldn’t be hard to simply ignore it.
Another insane take you keep bringing up. Why are you ok with players being forced to represent a certain thing on certain days? Would you wear a pride shirt on your company’s mandated pride celebration day, and then get mad if someone wears a pride shirt on another day? Something you could very easily just ignore? If so, then again, that’s saying a lot about you. It says you’re “willing” to “allow” people to “voice their support”, but only in ways that are unobtrusive and approved by you. At best, that’s selfish, and at worst, it’s authoritarian.
Until recently, the NBA had very strict rules on on shoe color. The NBA still has a restriction on third party logos:
As you said, they’re competitive professionals, so there’s going to be a lot of rule bending and breaking. Things have to be approved by the league, so it’s likely going to get political as to what’s allowed and what’s not allowed.
If they’re customer facing and intended to be in a uniform that represents the company, yes. If you’re working the front desk or something, you need to be wearing something company approved. If they’re not customer facing, I honestly don’t care what they wear, unless it’s a day when the higher ups are visiting or something.
Athletes represent the league and team they play for, and thus should wear an approved uniform. During practice or warmups is a different story, and they should be free to be more expressive. But once the game starts, they need to abide a more strict policy.
I’m not in any kind of position of authority here, so I’m not allowing or disallowing anything. I’m merely expressing what I think should and should not be policy of a sports organization. In my opinion, professional sports leagues should be all about the game, and that’s it. I would also prefer to eliminate all forms of advertising during the game, and only allow it before or after the game (or perhaps during halftime or period change breaks or whatever).
The NHL isn’t a government, it’s a sports league. If players don’t like the rules, they can leave, nobody is compelling anyone with force to do anything.
I don’t care about the existing NBA rules - we’re talking about why you personally have an issue with athletes representing causes during games.
You’re making a huge leap here. Why would it get political? From my view, sports leagues have it very easy when it comes to defining what a player can wear during play: as long as it doesn’t cause a safety risk, affect your competitive advantage or the integrity of the game, or cause the opponent visible confusion, it should be fair game. Does this require some official to make a judgement call? Sure. But that’s literally what officiated sports revolve around - a bunch of judgement calls.
The pride shirt in my example is provided and approved by the company. If the company says it’s ok to show your pride support on a specific day, why is it not ok to show that support on non-designated days? And don’t you see the unfair treatment you’re suggesting here? I’m just so baffled at why you care so much what other people wear? It seems like this is a hill you’re willing to die on, even though you’ve mentioned you’re willing to have your “opinion challenged” a few times. For someone trying to come off as open mined you seem like you have your heels dug in, and you haven’t really given any reasons why, aside from weak platitudes.
C’mon, now you’re just being pedantic. You approve of some authority being able to control the appearance of the people they have authority over, that’s obviously the intent of that phrase, I just didn’t want to type it all out because it’s overly wordy. You’re not discussing the point anymore at this point, you’re disingenuously attacking a turn of phrase.
And I’m trying to get you to answer the simple question, why? Why do you think this, other than because of your own perceived personal inconvenience?
I’m sorry to inform you that sports have never, and will never, be that. Almost all entertainment has always had an opinion, some sort of slant, or a message they’re trying to get across. If people didn’t like the message, they ignored it or stopped consuming that entertainment. That’s still an option you can exercise today.
Pedantry, again, and disingenuously putting words in my mouth.
This has to be irony, right? Please tell me you’re being ironic right now. Because if you’re not being ironic, wow, what a hypocrite you are.
Sexuality shouldn’t be political nor commercial and it’s folly to say it is.
And I didn’t say it is. I just said it isn’t relevant in a sporting event. But more specifically, I said any kind of speech from a player isn’t relevant in a sporting event unless it’s directly about the game (e.g. a poor call).