You must log in or register to comment.
Sounds like some dude came up with this ‘second law of infodynamics’ and then plucked out a bunch of examples that support his own law as if that somehow backed anything up at all. Didn’t read the paper itself but the article doesn’t do a very good job.
Infodynamics was first written about in 1941. This article does a terrible job. The paper doesn’t even discuss living in a simulation, or any implications or imply that we may be living in a simulation. This article is trash.
deleted by creator
The beginning of the 4th paragraph:
It’s more of a thought experiment than anything […]