• Amju Wolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh my bad, can’t read apparently. That amount of employees sounds way more reasonable, even if I feel like they weren’t doing much.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just think of half of your company getting laid off, that’s going to be noticable regardless of the total number of employees.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah no question about that. My point was just that I don’t understand why you’d need so many people for such a fairly simple project - with such a narrow scope; but that’s moot since they didn’t have that many people after all.