• UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly yeah. There’s been some controversies in the past, but for someone who’s looking for a zero-effort way to browse privately and support the privacy scene (DDG donates a lot of money) it’s a great choice. Wouldn’t recommend their browser/extensions though

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely would agree with this. The best of a bad bunch. I use it for nearly all my search.

      Did see some sketchy stuff with the android app/browser so probably would avoid… and besides, I’m in a decades long relationship with firefox <3.

      • janonymous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you use Firefox on mobile as well? I use the DDG browser and don’t whether I should switch. Haven’t heard what exactly is wrong with it, yet.

        • FippleStone@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use Firefox almost exclusively on android and have nothing but glowing praise for it, it’s a solid experience

        • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox for Android is great, and after some initial teething problems, it’s been solid for a long time.

          I remember seeing on reddit a story about a guy who created something and I think suggested DDG stole some of his work and packaged it up as their own. I cannot find it anymore, but remember seeing it at the time and it seemed convincing (even though I was using DDG search and was a fan of their work). I still use them, but not for everything and I remain skeptical. FF is open source, and has been pretty trustworthy for a long time imho.

      • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, there’s just no reason to use anything other than firefox on desktop

        On mobile IN MY EXPERIENCE Firefox has always been unbearably slow. I’ve tried everything: getting it from play store, F-Droid and github, using the beta and nightly version, tried it with and without extensions: it sometimes took 10+ seconds to load some pages, I don’t know why. It’s been like this on other smartphone models too.

        That’s why I use brave from mobile, it’s blazing fast and it has a lot of nice features, starting from the amazing bottom bar to their solid integrated adblocker and dark mode.

    • cucumberbob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m OOTL on DDG donations? What kinds of projects/people do they donate to, and how does that benefit pirates?

    • stonemilker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Their privacy policy and data flow have been the same since the buyout, they were transparent about any implications and the mitigations put in place to protect users, so I’m alright with it. The biggest problem I have with them is sometimes getting rate-limited because of a VPN or Tor, but that’s it. Alternatives like DDG and Brave Search are usually bad for results in my native language, so I’ve been using Startpage for a couple years now and it’s nice

      • FarLine99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me Brave search has pretty good results. Not as Google, of course, but enough. Definetly better than DDG.

        • Rooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its not about how good. How much privacy. Brave search is worse then DDG in all ways and form. Bad Search Results, Weird to get and read Privacy Policy???, Brave had at sometime a crypto miner in it.

          • FarLine99@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know why you have problem with Brave Search Privacy. They do log operating system and browser version. Is that scary? You can easily bypass this f.e. by using Chameleon Firefox extension.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they mostly handled it well, and ultimately the situation was resolved, but I still think they should have been a lot more up front about what they were doing.

    • NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can also use ddg.gg which is even shorter!

      And you don’t even need to go the website homepage, just type something like ddg.gg/search promt and it’ll give you results straight away.

      This is great even if you use a different search engine because you can use !bangs without needing to go through another webpage.

  • dan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use it everywhere but the search results are… variable. However it’s plenty good enough for most situations.

    I still switch back to Google if I’m not finding what I want (using DDG’s !g keyword, which is pretty helpful - just add that anywhere in a search and it’ll send you to Google), but at least I’m only doing that when I’m aware of it.

  • svamp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t DDG get caught allowing some Microsoft tracking and blocking some search results a couple of years back? Personally I use Firefox and starpage as a search engine.

    • darcy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, but presumably more anonymous

  • ggnoredo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s better than google but It’s not good. Only options is self hosted searxng

    • Vexz@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been using a self hosted instance of SearXNG but recently went away from SearXNG in gerneral. Why? Search results more than often enough ended in timeouts from the search engines. It was frustrating and they never fixed it. In terms of privacy it’s top notch though.

            • DocBarkowitz@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m mobile for the holiday right now, I’m not 100% sure on utilization. But it’s running on a 2 core 4 GB Ubuntu machine along with Caddy and Redis. I also have a Lemmy instance on that same machine so Lemmy, Lemmy-UI, Postgres, and pictr all fit on that machine and work for my daily use.

              I can get exact utilization later tonight.

  • codenul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Check out Mull browser. There’s mobile version as well for desktops. Its lightweight Firefox without any of the telemetry.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the recommendation. I wonder if you’re confusing the DuckDuckGo browser with the DuckDuckGo search engine. I am assuming the post is about the search engine 🙃

  • FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    NO.

    1. it is US-based
    2. the CEO is the former founder of the “Names Database”

    for the love of god, use anything but DDG. Qwant is EU-based and has decent results, SearX is another one which lets you choose between instances (or host your own).

    please stop taking US “privacy” services seriously. i was hoping people would know better on here, compared to reddit

  • palebluedot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s good, however you need to be more specific with your query for DDG to return good result.

    If you’re interested in other privacy respecting search engines, there’s Searxng and Kagi (paid).

  • DocBarkowitz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No.

    I run a private instance of searxng on a cloud provider. If you have the know how to run Docker or are looking for a reason to learn it’s a pretty painless setup.

    Searxng is a meta search engine that aggregates results from a lot of different search engines. You have the ability to configure which search engines it will use. For example you can have it aggregate results from Google, bing, yahoo, brave, DDG, startpage, and quant. You have a layer of abstraction between you and those services providing you extra privacy.

    You can run an instance on your laptop/desktop and access it locally which gives ok privacy and protects from JS and other browser level tracking. Problem is your IP can still be correlated to others in the same network who use google or w/e. Also makes accessing from your phone and other devices a bit more difficult especially outside of your LAN as you’ll need to poke a hole through your firewall and use Dynamic DNS for reliable access while mobile.

    Another option with better privacy is to run the instance in a public cloud provider like AWS, digital ocean, Linode, etc. This way Google, bing, yahoo, and other search engines just see the IP of your cloud instance making requests. It also makes mobile access easier since your instance will have a static IP that you can assign a DNS name to.

    In both cases you can use Caddy as a reverse proxy to serve as the public endpoint. Caddy allows you to easily set up TLS/HTTPS without paying for a certificate.

    https://github.com/searxng/searxng

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You elaborated a lot on your alternative setup but not at all why ddg is not good enough for you or in general.

  • donut4ever
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use an app called TrackerControl on my Android phone, and it caught several trackers on DDG, so I stopped using it. Do I know for certain that the app is absolutely accurate? Nope, but it’s a good FOSS that I have been using for a long time and developed a trust relationship with, so I’ll avoid what it warns me about. App is available on F-droid if anyone wants to try it.