• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no financial benefit to having such a network in Canada given airplanes exist for quick travel. There simply isn’t a need to move a large number of Canadians across the country on a regular basis, and the country is HUGE. Building that much high speed rail would be a waste of resources.

    We’d be far better off investing in a connection for Vancouver down the west coast of the US, and Toronto/Montreal down the east coast of the US.

    • grte@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Infrastructure is an investment. When the original rail across Canada was built it created it’s own value by allowing the land around it to be developed into towns, cities, and other productive uses. The same would be true here.

      As for your second paragraph I couldn’t disagree more. We should be investing in developing and connecting our own country, not subsuming ourselves into the USA.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        We already have a rail line across the country that works just fine for freight which doesn’t care as much about travel time. The only added benefit to a high speed rail line across the country would be faster travel of humans which is currently handled by road based vehicles or airplanes, there’s no significant value addition in a high speed rail line that would make up for the astronomical cost over such a distance.

        Unless you plan on turning Canada into a 300 million person country, the size to population ratio simply doesn’t provide for a use case for “connecting our own country”. We barely use any of our land for people right now, even along the US border where we are mostly tightly grouped. Half our population is in Southern Ontario/Southern Quebec, with only a half dozen other major cities worth mentioning across the entire country.

        Economies of scale matter, and Canada simply doesn’t have enough people to reach those for transportation networks across the country.

    • clockwork_axolotl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Busiest highway: Highway 401 in Ontario, Canada, has volumes surpassing an average of 500,000 vehicles per day.

      That paragraph is straight out of google. Saying that we don’t need high speed rail because we do not have the volume is blatantly untrue.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Highway 401 doesn’t even go “across Canada” its literally a small section of the most populated area of southern Ontario.

        We could certainly use high speed rail for specific links in Canada, just not a cross country link.

    • aDuckk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mentioned further down the thread that Canada doesn’t have the population for significant passenger rail development, which gets brought up a lot in this discussion. I can’t directly dispute that point, but doesn’t around 90% of the population live within 100km of the US border? We don’t need a network across the entire land mass, just hit at least one major city in each mainland province (sorry territories & maritimes) to start. One line for 90% seems like it would be a good deal unless I am missing something.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One line from Vancouver to Halifax is 5800km

        It’s currently estimated to be between $20-40m dollars per kilometer. That puts it at at least $120 billion at the low end to build but probably closer to $200 billion in reality. Then there are costs to actually run it.

        That’s about 1/6th of the entire national debt just to build a train service that would still take 2 days to get across the country, and there are operating costs on top of that each year.

        How would it be a better value that just continuing to use airplanes?

        • aDuckk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for your reply. That cost definitely puts it into perspective, especially if it doesn’t factor building stations and buying land in or around cities, delays & screwups, etc

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Toronto to Quebec City corridor certainly merits high speed rail. Maybe a line from Whistler down to Chilliwack. There’s a few places.