• Vuraniute@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yea, same. Ads have gotten so obnoxious to the point where the freaking FBI considers adblock an essential part of proper internet hygiene.

    • platypus_plumba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And remember, if the page actually had useful content that wasn’t click bait or some shit. Be nice… remove the adblocker and reload.

      They gotta pay bills too, having infrastructure deployed to serve content is not free. Don’t kill their business if they have quality content.

      • MrEUser@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no problem paying if I have the option. If they want more than it’s worth, buh bye… If not I’ll pay. What I don’t need is being forced to swallow their pollution to get access to needed information.

      • Vuraniute@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it’s an understandable amount of ads, I’ll disable ad block. If the site bombards me with an unjustifiable amount of ads (like adblock-tester level of ads) then I’ll re enable adblock in seconds. Same goes for if they serve scam ads like those ‘virus detected’ or ‘hot singles in your area’ malvertisements

      • pogister@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s their prerogative to refuse serving. It’s my prerogative to go somewhere else. Adblocker stays up, sorry.