• br3d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While there are hungry people, we shouldn’t be growing crops just to set fire to them

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the US produces a massive surplus of corn (questionable government subsidies), only a tiny portion “sweet corn” (not shown on upper graph) is ever meant for the table

      the VAST majority of US corn is relatively inedible “feed corn” meant for agricultural feed lots (blue bars, “Feed and residual use”) and industrial chemical manufacturing – ethanol (orange bars, “Alcohol for fuel use”), and fertilizers, food additives, etc. (gray bars, “Other food, seed, and industrial use”)

      EDIT: check out Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma (2006) to get an idea of how dependent US is on industrial corn

    • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bio fuels are definitely an issue in that regard (and if SAF becomes a thing it can rapidly spin out of control). However, so far the far bigger issue here is the meat industry. Go vegan, save lives, save rainforest.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Meat isn’t that much bigger than biofuels at this point. In the US, there’s something like equal split of corn consumption and 3:2 meat:bioful on soy.

        Mind you, the biofuels don’t kick out as much methane, so they’ve got a more limited climate impact.