• FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This one? It appears to be a sci-fi action thriller, so the scenario presented in it is likely tailored to maximize the sense of danger at the expense of realism in order to sell more copies.

      Skimming through the plot synopsis it seems like people magically have a supply of laser-guided missiles whenever there’s an opportune moment to attempt to blow protagonists up, for example.

      • navi@lemmy.tespia.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah sorry, should have mentioned it’s a near future scifi book, definitely not a scientifically accurate novel 😂.

        It does however explore a lot of the moral issues around drones acting on their own to target people.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a bit if a personal hangup of mine how often debate about real-world actually-real matters get preempted with people objecting to certain courses of action because they saw a cheesy sci-fi movie about it (which of course has things “go wrong” because you don’t sell many tickets to a movie about everything working out fine). AI in particular has a very fertile range of scaremongering to select from so I’m perhaps a little hyper vigilant on that topic.

          I haven’t read the book so I can’t speak to the philosophical aspects of it, just felt I should point out the cinematic biases of such works. In real life countermeasures to weapons are often developed in tandem with the weapons themselves. This war in Ukraine is probably going to be unique in not having them since the weapon is still so fresh.