“The term natural gas does not explicitly convey the fossil origins of such gas, leading to potential misunderstandings and hampering policy-making,”

  • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not being familiar with all things oil and gas would be pretty common for people not living in areas where it is processed or compressed. It’s much like a Linux enthusiast being upset at Windows and Mac users not realizing there are other OSs for computers. Might not be in their realm of thought.

    Natural has been a wonderfully misleading marketing term for food products too. There’s no regulations in the US on what one calls “natural” ingredients. Most people mistake it for being like organic just as intended. Natural just sounds good. Unfortunately radioactive material can be natural too.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it’s least well defined, so you can rely on it always meaning the same thing, which is IMO the most important thing.

        • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s true, I am always grateful to know whether or not my food is carbon-based.

          All the other claims are fluffy af, and it doesn’t mean what most consumers think it means, which is arguably more important when it’s a marketing term more so than anything else.

            • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              What do you think “organic” means when you see it on packaging?

              No pesticides? Carbon neutral? GMO-free? Bunny friendly? Cures or prevents cancer? Prevents monocultures? Cures diabetes?

              I’ve heard all this from people trying to justify why they insist on buying organic. It doesn’t mean what consumers think it means, and the only meaning that is well-defined is the other one.

              Didn’t realize people had no sense of humour about it, but I won’t stop because I think it’s vile that companies market this nonsense with a halo on to fool consumers, sometimes by referencing very serious health or environmental claims.

    • kakes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You got me there, I am indeed from Alberta, Canada. Do people really not have any idea where the fuel they use every day comes from? Maybe I’m just more curious than others, I guess.

      To be clear, I don’t disagree with changing the term to something less misleading. Just surprised is all.