• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahhhh ok sure. It could be read that way as well. I assumed it was Jon’s stitches.

      • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It took me a minute too, it’s easier to understand if you pretend it’s 1978 and doctors and vets are almost exclusively male.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It only works as a punchline if the vet is male since Garfield is male. It has nothing to do with the demographics of doctors and/or vets.

          • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not explicitly, but implicitly. The purpose of the comic was to provide humor, but the environment it was created in also affected the composition of the comic. Our interpretation is from the perspective of those immersed in the current environment instead. The demographics of doctors and veterinarians in 2023 are not the same as they were at the release of this particular Garfield. Firemen and Policemen are now Firefighters and Police Officers, partially because we now know we can’t assume a person’s gender based on their career. The comic slightly loses fluidity and ease of understanding as society progresses. It’s funny, but it did not age very well.