Because what could possibly go wrong.

  • V H@lemmy.stad.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Largely, I expect, because of the point you make. Needing an actual army of people to control them becomes a limiting factor. Add on to that that requiring remote control makes them vulnerable to jamming, and there’s a strong incentive to start making them more and more autonomous both to enable fewer soldiers to control more bots, and to allow them to retain some function without it.

    It just largely seems like it will be too significant a temptation.