• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK, I did. It still says what it did before. You state that UBI didn’t significantly increase employment, and then equated that with quality of life.

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          and then equated that with quality of life.

          No I didn’t. It would help if you would just accept what I am telling you is my argument instead of weak-ass gotchas.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is this supposed to be some “gotcha?” You claimed that UBI did not increase quality of life with your only source stating that it had no effect on employment. What does employment inherently have to do with quality of life?

            • JasSmith@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I didn’t claim work is a requirement for QOL. Instead of addressing my comment, you’re hyper-focusing on a grammatical disagreement which is completely immaterial. Since you lack any substantive disagreement, I take this to mean you agree with my premise.

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Since you’re being so disingenuous, I’m just going to assume no argument you make us done in good faith. Fuck along, now.