I wonder how many moderators may adjust their protest time frame as a result of this comment…

  • e l f
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Wasn’t this goober just saying reddit wasn’t profitable? What revenue lol?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Profits are revenue minus expenses. If all the revenue goes into garbage like nfts and new reddit (or up spez’s nose) there can be a lot of revenue but no profit.

  • Maeqa
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Makes me wonder what reddit’s usage stats will be in late July or early August once things settle into whatever normal they’re going to be. I can’t imagine they can pull good mod tools out of their asses quickly enough to combat the spam that’ll undoubtedly crop up without automod, etc.

    I think the question is whether this move will ultimately annoy the regular casual lurkers enough. Will it make an impact on reddit’s stats and reputation or not?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      A flood of spam posts hawking cryptocurrency and hot singles in your area might even look on the usage metrics for a while

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      They’ll probably just plug Automod into OpenAI’s content moderation API or something if too much spam piles up

      • Maeqa
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Oh dear gods, that is the most horrible idea I have heard in my life and yet I somehow fully expect that kind of bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          AI content moderation will be chump change if they get enough takers on this new API pricing. Plus they’re wanting to IPO at a time when every Fortune 500 is jumping on the AI bandwagon in quarterly reports, so I’d be surprised if they don’t already have teams researching this internally.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    I mean he’s not really wrong some subs are already opening back up, without indefinite closure nothings going to really change

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I agree. I think that the whole movement should move to indefinite closure. If anything, it gives us a reason to pop some popcorn!

  • godless
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Exactly what a struggling CEO is expected to say to keep employees from jumping ship.

  • zach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, he’s right. They have their work cut out for them though. They’ll need to be on top of things especially regarding moderation, otherwise they will probably continue to bleed users.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      They never really had real moderation to begin with, just random volunteers that they gave way too much power to, which is going to be a big problem when they go public. They’ll be under a lot more public and government scrutiny.

      • zach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This is a good point. Well, they either have a plan or we’re going to witness a top 20 website fail in real time.

    • DreamySweet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Revenue and profits aren’t the same thing. Profits are what is left of the revenue after expenses are paid.

      • I'm back on my BS 🤪
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        true, but that’s like telling a crew of a sinking ship, “guys, i know a lot have abandoned ship, but we’re still good on buckets.”

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Which tells me he’s probably not that good at his job (which should be maintaining a balance between the two IMO)…