There’s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. We’ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm… sounds a bit too idealistic to be true, especially given how Facebook has acted in the past. I appreciate his hope for the future, but I think he severely underestimates the lengths to which FB will go to monetize and control users on their platforms.

    Here’s the scenario I don’t like. Threads scrapes my OC on a federated server, then reposts it to their users with advertisements. Now, not only has FB taken my OC without getting my permission or even informing me, they’re now garnering profit from it. If this were a print publication, this would plainly be copyright theft. And if I want to remove my content that’s now hosted on Threads without my permission, there’s no possible way for me to do so - I can delete the post and hope their federated server does the same, but given how hard they make it to delete a FB account, I’m not terribly optimistic.

    It’s no wonder #threads isn’t launching in Europe - there’s no way in hell this kind of thing is even remotely GDPR compliant.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone willing to give Meta even the slightest bit of the benefit of the doubt is at best incredibly naive and at worst an outright idiot.

    • BobQuasit@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s an interesting point. Can anyone take your original content and repost it to make money? As I understand it, anything you create is theoretically copyrighted at the moment you created. You’re not required to file a copyright, at least not in the United States.

      • Itty53@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure they can. Stack overflow is one example. Any business operating on user driven content will be culpable. When you agree to the EULA and it tells you “what you post here belongs to us and we grant you a license to publish it yourself”, you’re signing over ownership of your content in exchange for a license to replicate it. That’s how social media all works, all the EULAs work that way. FOSS is no different.

        • asteroidrainfall@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude a federated SO would be a dream. Imagine actually be able to post something without it being flagged as a duplicate of a 10 year old outdated question.

    • hiyaaaaa23@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look I don’t want to be combative here, and my sincere apologies if this response comes off that way but here goes

      IMHO this is already the way activitypub works. Platforms that choose to federate, are able to pool their posts and the like. And yes instances can make money off of content posted on other instances. That’s not a bug it’s a feature.

      On the other hand, meta sucks and I’m not sure if I’d really want to federate with them either. So like, idk lol, just spitballing

      • Halogen2744@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        100%. The open and public nature of the fediverse is something everyone should be considering every single time they post on a federated platform. I don’t want to federate with meta because ew , but it would be absurd to think that a public platform like this isn’t gonna get scraped to hell anyways.