I’m thinking about how emails ended up becoming. Where our first email addresses were so wacky, and slowly we just wanted out real names.

  • laurens@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have two accounts, one with my real name, that I want to be tied to my real life identity, and an anonymous one. They are simply for quite different purposes. I very much understand and appreciate the need for privacy by default. But for some stuff I dont mind that its public, and I actually prefer that. Like this post, for example. I’m fine with IRL people knowing some of the stuff I post on the internet. But most certainly I also want privacy, and them not knowing everything.

  • density@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    no idea what happened but a few years ago there was buzz about a company called keebase which was to do identify verification across platforms.

    it seems to have something to do with “blockchain” though so I never got much use from it because anything with blockchain smells scammy to me. maybe something like that (without bitcoin) which would be useful.

  • theinspectorst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends on the type of Fediverse service. I tended to find people used their real name on Twitter but a pseudonym on Reddit. I expect the same will be true of Mastodon and Kbin respectively.

    • Hellsadvocate@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I… I’m not sure? I feel like it does introduce a bit of bias. The anonymity helps to add some blindness on upvoting comments. For example, I doubt a girl with their name intact would post openly about how to go about having an abortion in a red state.

      • density@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        people who post on social media with female sounding names are also subject to regular, random abuse from strangers, especially if they become even a tiny bit prominent.

    • SlowNPC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can think of several reasons off the top of my head.

      Perhaps you want to discuss things your boss doesn’t want employees talking about (teachers discussing drugs/alcohol/nsfw stuff or anyone trash-talking their employer).

      Perhaps you want to discuss things your family/friends don’t approve of (closeted LGBT, political opinions, drugs/nsfw, mental health, even stuff like motorcycles).

      Perhaps you want to discuss controversial topics and reduce the chance of having some lunatic send you death threats.

    • Emotional_Series7814@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Doxxers.

      I say I like apples. Someone else thinks I’m literally Satan for that and need to die in a fire for promoting the apple agenda. They have more work to do under my current username if they want to get my home address and beat me up, or send a SWAT team after me. Just giving out my real name makes it a lot easier.

      I’m a nobody, but I’m a nobody who likes to say things on the internet sometimes, and other nobodies can be crazy sometimes. Or sadists who don’t think I deserve to die in a fire but sure think it would be funny and want to see me post about the attempted arson.

  • Ragnell@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if we get to the point that we need professional accounts that will happen. Like, say the US Government finally gets fed up with Twitter and establishes a mastodon so that the Dept of the Interior can talk to the public again. Maybe some people will have official mastodon accounts on that server, and use their real names.

    • Hellsadvocate@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a really good point. Has there been any talk about how verification of users might work for when that does happen?

      • cyberian_khatru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mastodon has a system that verifies an account’s possession of another webpage. So that could help with company accounts.

      • Ragnell@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would imagine the instance is in charge of verification, and the instance itself will need to be verified.

        With US government stuff, I wouldn’t trust anything not .gov but I’m not sure how others will handle it.