• roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      91
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The original was released by EA over 20 years ago. It’s not like its something they bought up.

    • Jaysyn
      link
      fedilink
      159 months ago

      You said this so much more diplomatically than I was going to.

    • Dangdoggo
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      EA was hardly a mega corp when they published the first game though. Where is Taylor Swift when you need her?

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        159 months ago

        What? EA has been a mega corp in the game industry since forever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          169 months ago

          This prompted me to look into their history, and yeah, looks like they were basically a super-group formed out of employees from names like Apple and Atari and were big right out of the gate.

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 months ago

            I was mainly just thinking how EA Sports games have been a thing for as long as I can remember. Even when video games was a small industry, they were still a big fish.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    58
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ah they nailed him with a noncompete for that public domain IP. Crafty.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      For what it’s worth, you can’t use public domain to make a copy of someone else’s take on that public domain character. It’s like how Winnie the Pooh is public domain but you can’t make a Winnie the Pooh with a red shirt and no pants since thats clearly Disney’s version which isn’t public domain.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 months ago

    I enjoyed Madness Returns but the main problem was that some of the chapters just dragged so much. If they’d cut it down they could have made a really really good budget game and nothing of value would have been lost. It’s a 14 hour game with 6 hours of content.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    “Also, there’s a tv series in production.”

    Yeah, right. I’ll believe it when I see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      I’d rather have the property say dead than reviving it into another fucking show that is put out just to cash in on some nostalgia only to be cancelled after the first season.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 months ago

    Well hopefully American McGee will make a come back with some other great video game series. There are plenty of ideas out there outside of Alice in Wonderland. Though that was a great game! I hope he doesn’t give up quite yet.

  • @penix
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      I keep trying to play it, but the levels are so fucking long. I just want the story now.

    • SamXavia
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      It’s one of the games that I’ve been meaning to play on my backlog. It does suck that it’s not going to have a sequel.

  • SamXavia
    link
    fedilink
    49 months ago

    That sucks, I would have loved to see Asylum come to the surface. Sadly as it’s been so many years I don’t think it’s going to get around to much that it’s no longer happening or was happening in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 months ago

      He can make something based off of Through the Looking Glass, but he can’t make something called American McGee’s Alice or use any established characters from that IP.

      • Pxtl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        Realistically he should just switch to another public domain fantasy. Kickstart “American McGee’s Oz”.

      • FfaerieOxide
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        He can make something based off of Through the Looking Glass

        And he should. Give the characters a dye job, spell their names different, and have at it.

    • umbraroze
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They can’t touch an IP derived from a public domain work. If they want to make a new IP, they have to go through all the effort of re-deriving it from the public domain work. Hope this makes sense, I’m just a creative person and not a lawyer.

      Edit: If derivative works from public domain were not protected, WOO BOY would Disney be in trouble.

      • FfaerieOxide
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Right but what’s the problem? If you’ve still got stories to tell, tell them about a “different” Alice.

        • umbraroze
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          I mean, if EA wants to reboot the whole franchise, they can do so. But they can’t use any of the stuff in American McGee’s Alice IP, or anything too closely resembling that stuff. The question then becomes this: do they want to use their creative budget to do that… or do they want to use their budget for something else entirely? In other words: Is American McGee’s Alice an IP that’s financially worth it to rebuild from scratch? Answer: Probably no.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            I haven’t seen the sequel, but the original is basically taking a children’s story and making it twisted and gory (kind of the reverse of what happened to Grimm Brothers fairytales, now that I think about it). If that’s the magic sauce, I’d think that it’d be possible to do something similar with any children’s story.

          • FfaerieOxide
            link
            fedilink
            09 months ago

            Who’s talking about EA?

            I thought American McGee was complaining they sold “Alice” and now EA doesn’t want to make more.

            If AM wants to make more, make more and file off what markers you have to.

            • umbraroze
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Well, if American McGee wants to rebuild the franchise from scratch, then he faces the exact same problem, doesn’t he?

              If EA wants to remake the franchise, they’re basically saying “Look, we filed the serial markers off, here’s a new Dark Alice in the Wonderland IP”, and they know nobody will buy it.

              If American McGee wants to remake the franchise, it’s basically “Look EA, we can’t actually remake the Dark Alice in the Wonderland IP, but here’s Wark Dalice in the Anderland IP”, and none of the EA’s lawyers will buy it, and he get sued to oblivion by EA.

              It’s an extermely uncomfortale stalemate regardless of the fact that the original stories were in public domain.

              Sure, American McGee can go “well fuck it, here’s a super fucking cute and lore-friendly happy trippy Alice in the Wonderland remake that totally goes to a whole different direction this time, HEY BACK OFF DISNEY LAWYERS, I said totally different direction”, but that’s no longer American McGee’s Alice, now is it?

              • FfaerieOxide
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                There is no way EA owns the rights to every implementation of “Lewis Carrol but macabre!” any more than Rhys Frake-Waterfield could stop me from making a film where Winnie The Pooh kills people with a chainsaw.

                • umbraroze
                  link
                  fedilink
                  29 months ago

                  That’s a good angle to speculate on it. But the main thing to take away is this: Do they want to pursue this angle, or are they more willing to sit on this IP until the end of the time? I mean, sitting on an IP is a whole lot more legally safe than, you know, attempting to make some new wild legally-distinct numbers-filed-off things from it. (PROTIP: EA does this really well.)

                  And more importantly, is American McGee willing to rework this whole thing from the ground up?

                  Speaking as a random creative person: If I was in American McGee’s position, I’d drop this stuff right away and go think of other ventures. The moneybagmen sadly won.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Make it a happy fluffy game where you beat things to death and stuffing goes everywhere while little children cheer.

        That could be even creepier

    • @MomoTimeToDie
      link
      English
      09 months ago

      It’s very likely that as a part of whatever existing deal he has with EA, he had to specifically sign some form of non-competition clause that made it so he can’t just leave and make “shmalice in shmonderland” and say it’s technically distinct, despite being the obvious follow up to the games owned by EA. Greedy? Yeah. But it’s not like he didn’t know what he was signing up for. There’s plenty of other options for publishers out there who are perfectly willing to not give a fuck about your IP, and just want up front cash and/or a cut of sales. The downside being that, unlike someone like EA, theyre going to have a much more limited reach in terms of getting your game on store shelves, and getting ads in front of eyeballs, if they even do that much.