Of course, it’s better to emit less carbon, and support systems and policies that emit less carbon. That said, carbon emission is unavoidable, and I’d like to minimize that portion of my impact as much as possible.

I am definitely willing to pay to offset my carbon usage, but I’m under the impression that this is mostly a scam. Does anyone use these services? If so, can you tell me what reasoning or sources you used that satisfied you that the service your chose isn’t a scam?

  • deranger
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When plants break down they release CO2. It needs to never decompose to remove carbon dioxide.

      • kakes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because we breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2. The Oxygen is attaching to Carbon and leaving our body with every breath.
        This is the opposite of plants, which breathe in CO2 and breathe out O2, storing that Carbon.

        That said, I’m sure we also release a lot of CO2 when we decompose. Worst of both worlds, really.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I mean. If mishandling a plant’s death is bad for us, then handling an animal’s death in the same way should be good for us, right?

          • JungleJim
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately not. While animals inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide, and plants inhale carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, both plants and animals release essentially the components upon death and decay, and these components, mostly carbon dioxide, are already overly represented due to fossil fuels consumption.

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Considering the Earth has been around for a billion or so years, I can’t understand how these two circumstances combined haven’t turned Earth into a one gas system by now. I’m not a global warming skeptic, but this part just seems off.

              • JungleJim
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Until we started burning fuels, it balanced itself. What we call fossil fuels is literally the buried carbon of life that came before. The stuff the natural process already dealt with once before. We brought it back, and now it all has to be reprocessed and put back in the ground or deep ocean where we got it or there’s no balance in the system and it will take very long times for natural processes to bring it back to normal levels, maybe never.

                Imagine a full bath tub with the drain open and the water running., Water is flowing in and out at an even rate, meaning the tub is draining but stays pretty much full. Now imagine somebody took the drain pipe and routed it back into the tub. Now the drain has to deal with that water again, and the new water coming through the tap.