Yes people with different ideas on what should be a core feature of modern city management are stupid. Honestly even when CS1 came out the car-only approach felt a bit anachronistic.
If you don’t care about that, that’s fine. But being disappointed that there’s basically been no progress in this matter in the past 10 years doesn’t make people stupid.
I’m a software developer, I’m well aware. I can’t look info their development schedule or budget. And as a user it’s my prerogative not to care. Either the software does what I want or it doesn’t.
In this case we’re asking the developer to consider adding a feature and letting him know we don’t consider the product feature complete without for our use case.
They are free to take the suggestion or not. No one involved here it’s acting particularly idiotically imo.
Yes people with different ideas on what should be a core feature of modern city management are stupid. Honestly even when CS1 came out the car-only approach felt a bit anachronistic.
If you don’t care about that, that’s fine. But being disappointed that there’s basically been no progress in this matter in the past 10 years doesn’t make people stupid.
So what features do you lose so you can have the time to develop bicycles?
Development is ALWAYS a tradeoff.
I’m a software developer, I’m well aware. I can’t look info their development schedule or budget. And as a user it’s my prerogative not to care. Either the software does what I want or it doesn’t.
In this case we’re asking the developer to consider adding a feature and letting him know we don’t consider the product feature complete without for our use case.
They are free to take the suggestion or not. No one involved here it’s acting particularly idiotically imo.