• dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it because it reaches a critical mass of usage, so the people get to take it back?

    It’s not my point but that’s literally how it legally works in the US. That’s why Velcro insists on calling their product “Velcro brand hook and loop fastener”

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s actually pretty common too. Just off the top of my head: Cleanex, Xerox and Nintendo have all had to do similar things to protect their trademark.

    • whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      TIL about trademark erosion. Also, thanks for a proper response.

      Trademark erosion, or genericization, is a special case of antonomasia related to trademarks. It happens when a trademark becomes so common that it starts being used as a common name and the original company has failed to prevent such use.

      I guess Nintendo fought it successfully by getting the world to call the thing a “game console” rather than calling it a Nintendo. Hoover failed to defend the verb “Hoover” and lost it.

      In this case, it just seems like the win is for Taco Bell and their efforts to gain, use and profit from the term. And that makes it feel a little gross and brutish. They could prove me wrong though.