• spacecadet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use Firefox because I want you use a web browser whose main focus is browsing the web.

    • JulyTheMonth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      146
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really really want to believe in firefox but the corporations behind it are way too fishy.

      The whole setup of mozilla foundation and mozilla coporation stinks. Mozilla asking for donations when the donation amount is barely 1 percent of their income.

      • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s an odd complaint. If they didn’t ask for donations, donations would be a lower % of their income. How many donations do you need before you can ask for donations?

        • JulyTheMonth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          46
          ·
          11 months ago

          If a corporations earns halve a billion. Does it really need donations?

          The whole concept of a parent company owning the foundation is fishy. Its just as strange that firefox seems to be like by privacy people when the owners are as instranparent as mozilla.

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            11 months ago

            Firefox is open source. Check it out for yourself or find a fork that works better for you.

          • kirklennon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            The whole concept of a parent company owning the foundation is fishy.

            The non-profit foundation is the parent company. It has some taxable subsidiaries that, among other things, handle certain revenue-generating business deals.

            • JulyTheMonth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              You say that like it is any better.

              A non-profit that owns a for-profit company is very well not realy non-profit. Just because all their profit is made by one of their subsidaries? And yet mozilla stand itself on some kind of moral highground.

              • kirklennon@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                A non-profit that owns a for-profit company is very well not realy non-profit.

                All of the profit of the subsidiary goes to the nonprofit parent, in furtherance of its nonprofit mission. The subsidiary doesn’t exist to make anybody rich but just to earn (taxable) income for the parent.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I really really want to believe in firefox but the corporations behind it are way too fishy.

        You’re right. Let’s continue using browsers made by Google or Microsoft instead. No fishiness there at all!

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I could rail against Mozilla’s management for hours, but if they’re bad enough for you to write off the browser, Microsoft and Google must be radioactive.

        I guess you can still use Arachne.