• photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I agree. I just mean that Hamas wanted to sow chaos and destruction by doing what they did, and well, that’s what they got. It’s still unclear who fired that rocket, whether it was a misfire or whatever, but if Hamas hadn’t attacked, there would be no israeli ground offensive, half of Gaza wouldn’t have been ordered to evactuate, and a lot of innocents would still be alive today.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          …And Hamas wouldn’t have wanted to sow chaos and destruction if Israel had been negotiating in good faith since 1967. But they haven’t. So here we are.

          Hamas is an entity of Israel’s creation, and was funded by Israel to remove support from other, less militant Palestinian organizations.

          • P1r4nha@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Zionists argue all the way back to several hundreds years B.C. Not that you can always draw an exactly straight line here, but the point should be that no reaction is inevitable, but that we have organized governments here making these decisions every day.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, shit, then argue back before that. What of the Babylonians and the Assyrians that the Israelites genocided? What of their ancestors? Shouldn’t they have their land returned to them?

              • BluesF@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you go far enough back we’re probably all entitled to the land. Let’s just do away with these “borders” and make the whole world into a theme park instead.

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m in favor of annihilation of humans as a species and returning the land to the rightful owners: the plants and (non-human) animals. Surely they can’t fuck it up as much as we have.

                  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Mushrooms and molds always being left out…

                    Which is sad because I’m told they’re pretty fungi

          • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every time there’s been a viable two-state solution presented, Hamas or whoever was the palestinian authroity at the time rejected the proposal because they want all of Israel. That isn’t happening. Israel has agreed to a two state solution multiple times! The representatives of palestine never have. If they had, this situation would’ve stabilized decades ago.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Israel has agreed to a two state solution multiple times!

              Certainly not in 1995, or in 2014. They’ve also went back on their own ceasefires with Hamas in 2008 and 2012.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fact is, Hamas slaughering 1400 people wouldn’t have happened if Israel hadn’t oppress the Palestine people for more than 50 years. That is what UN chief is saying, because they’ve been calling out Israel bs for a long time. Israel have the power themselves to stop the cycle of hate, but they didn’t, instead they intensified it.

    • Five@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you making a justification for a hospital bombing?

            • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              While the hospital disaster wouldn’t have happened if not for the attack, the attack also wouldn’t have happened if not for the blockades, terrorization of Palestinians, demolition of houses, and non stop settler violence everywhere even in the West Bank.

              • probablyaCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                And the blockades wouldn’t have happened if the Palestinian people didn’t put Hamas in power after, in attempts at peace and a two state solution, Israel demilitarized Gaza. And the wall wouldn’t have happened without the suicide bus bombings. I mean we can carry this back. At a minimum we can’t stop until WWI. And that’s really just a minimum. The crusades would be another point to carry it back to but that seems real far.

              • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Also true. But an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. There needs to be peace. And there can be no peace with Hamas, whose mission it is to completely destroy Israel.

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why do they have that mission? Is it possibly die to decades of Isreal trying to completely destroy Palestine?

                • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, but after they take two men and a kidney, you gotta at least take an eye.

                  If you think that there’s no peace with Hamas, but there’s peace with Isn’trael, then you may be delusional. Just ask the West bank.