• Grangle1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The evidence just keeps piling up, week after week. I’m not sure if they’re necessarily in league with the casinos, but they do certainly favor certain teams they want to push over others. As a fan of a big rival of one such team, it frustrates me to no end. Everyone else in our division hates them with a passion because we all know they get preferential treatment by the refs and we’ve all been screwed by it many times more than they’ve been screwed by the refs, and the few times they have bad calls go against them, it’s treated like a serious crime, while when we’re screwed by refs it’s just “oops, sorry”.

    • jedibob5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the NFL nor the casinos have any incentive to fix matches. Isn’t it pretty much the opposite? If there’s an impression that the matches are rigged, wouldn’t that deter betting?

      I just think it comes from a lack of accountability at the officiating level. There basically aren’t any consequences for even flagrantly blown calls, and the Replacement Refs fiasco made it a lot harder to try and enforce any. After the NFL tried to introduce video reviews of PI after the Saints-Rams NFCCG incident, the refs basically went into open revolt and refused to overturn just about anything challenged by the rule, and the NFL ended up backing down.

      IMO the best move would be the NFL offering the refs union a pay raise too big to ignore, in exchange for agreeing to a meaningful system of accountability around flagrant and/or repeated blown calls. I don’t know exactly what such a system would look like, and it’d be a hard balance to strike (people are human and sometimes just don’t see stuff), but I feel like it has to be possible to some degree.

      • ryathal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think refs do have some grading and bonus incentives. The problem is that it’s all very private, which does make some sense. The NFL being more open about egregious errors would be nice though.

    • TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they were actually in league with the casinos, they would never admit the calls were wrong.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are the Ravens becoming the next “the refs always favor them” team? Joining the Chiefs to usurp the Pats and Packers?

    • ryathal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were favored against the lions, but it definitely didn’t change the outcome.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s just habit from the refs not used to favoring the Lions. But yeah, that had no bearing on the outcome.